Development of Multicultural Education in Tatarstan and Kazakh
https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.3.12
EDN: BPYYGC
Abstract
The research relevance can be explained by the fact that ethnic pedagogy with its rich traditions and experience in educating young people should serve as a tool in the context of globalization. Pedagogical science will be effective in addressing the values that lie in oral creativity and within customs and traditions of peoples. The study aims to reveal the mechanisms and tools of ethnic pedagogy in a multicultural educational environment. The leading research method is modeling. This method enables us to consider the development of multicultural education as a process of purposeful and conscious mastery of a certain type of multiethnic culture, the formation of which occurs through interethnic integration, social adaptation of the individual in a multinational society, through the knowledge of the cultural layer of the language reflecting the values. The author's developed model shows the process of formation and improvement of multicultural education in the elements of ethnic pedagogy and methodological provisions of the pedagogical process. The significance of the study lies in the combination of solutions to educational tasks for preservation of human cultural identity, development of tolerant behavior and respect for cultural differences of interethnic integration, development of common and unique traditions, lifestyle, values of nearby peoples.
About the Authors
Guzaliya Fahrutdinova
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kazan
Zarina Ibrayeva
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Astana
Kulzhanat Bulatbayeva
Y. Altynsarin National Academy of Education
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Astana
References
1. Agadullin, R. R. (2003). Multicultural professional competence of a modern teacher. In Problems of modern pedagogical education (pp. 12–17). Kiev: Pedagogicheskaya pressa.
2. Akhmetzhanova, Z. K. (1989). Functional semantic fields of the Russian and Kazakh languages (comparative study). Nauka KazSSR.
3. Alieva, N. N. (2007). Cross-culture as a methodology of second language study in modern linguadidactics. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena – Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 7(28), 7–13.
4. Amirkhan, I. (2003). Tatar philosophy and national education. Tatarskoye knizhnoye izdatel'stvo.
5. Bayramova, L. K. (1996). The language model of Tatarstan. In L. K. Bayramova (Ed.), Models of national languages (pp. 13–22). Kazan: Izd-vo Kazanskogo universiteta.
6. Bim-Bad, B. M. (1998). Pedagogical Anthropology. URAO.
7. Dzhurinskiy, A. N. (2002). Multicultural education: The essence and prospects of development. Pedagogika – Pedagogy, 10, 93–96.
8. Fahrutdinova, G. Zh., & Solovyova, E. G. (2014). Formation of the value-oriented polycultural personality of a future teacher in the contemporary educational space. Life Science Journal, 11(11 s.), 272–276.
9. Fahrutdinova, G. Zh., Bulatbayeva, K. N., Kondratova, O. I., Fedorova, S. N., & Petukhova, O. A. (2018). Updating of language training content in Kazakhstan: implementation of new linguodidactic approaches. XLinguae, 11(2), 239-255.
10. Gaifullin, V. G. (1999). The national-regional component of the standard of education: The Tatarstan version. Izdatel'stvo TGGPI.
11. Humboldt, V. (1984). Selected works on linguistics. Progress Publ.
12. Iskhakova, Z. A. (2002). Functional interaction of the Tatar and Russian languages in modern Tatarstan. In N. P. Musina (Ed.), Language and ethnicity at the turn of the century: Ethnosociological essays on the linguistic situation in the Republic of Tatarstan (pp. 29–31). Magarif.
13. Kharisov, F. F. (1999). Multilingual Tatarstan and the problem of psychology of multilingualism. In The language situation in the Republic of Tatarstan: state and prospects: Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference in 2 parts (pp. 119–124). Poligr. uchastok Izd-va.
14. Klimova, T. V. (2017). Multicultural education: A collection of educational and methodological materials for the direction of training 44.03.02 Psychological and pedagogical education. Izd-vo Amurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.
15. Kozhakhmetova, K. Zh. (2016). Multicultural education in multi-ethnic Kazakhstan: problems and prospects. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Obrazovaniye i zdravookhraneniye – Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Education and Healthcare, 1(3), 93–96.
16. Likhachev, D. (1989). Notes and Observations: From notebooks of different years. Sovetskiy pisatel'.
17. Mukharyamova, L. M. (2003). Language relations: A political analysis. Izd-vo Kazanskogo universiteta.
18. Ravich, D. (2010). The Death and Life of the Great American School System: how testing and choice undermine education. Basic Books.
19. Safin, F. G. (2000). Ethnolinguistic processes in Bashkortostan in 20th century (M.N. Guboglo, Ed.). TSIMO.
20. Shaimerdenova, N. Zh. (2019). Glosses as a text phenomenon. Flinta.
21. Stolyarova, G. R. (2005). The modern language situation in the Republic of Tatarstan. In M. N. Guboglo (Ed.), The Russian language in Turkic-Slavic ethnocultural interactions: Ethnological essays (pp.75–87). Tsentr po izucheniyu mezhetn. otnosheniya In-ta etnologii i antropologii.
22. Suleimenova, E. D. (2016). Language as a resource of soft power. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University.
Review
For citations:
Fahrutdinova G., Ibrayeva Z., Bulatbayeva K. Development of Multicultural Education in Tatarstan and Kazakh. Education and Self-Development. 2023;18(3):184-201. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.3.12. EDN: BPYYGC
Views:
7
Email this article 