Stereotypes as a Possible Predictor of Women's Underrepresentation in STEM: STEM Stereotypes Questionnaire Development
https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.2.09
EDN: YOKCLL
Abstract
Women are underrepresented in STEM. Researchers note that gender stereotypes are the main explanation for gender disparities in STEM. Methods for measuring stereotypes do not take into account the contexts of education and careers in STEM. This study is an attempt to develop a tool for measuring stereotypes, using mix methods approach. At the first stage (qualitative research), the factor structure of the instrument was determined (method interview, sample of 18 women); at the second stage (quantitative research), a questionnaire on stereotypes in STEM was developed and tested (sample of 145 women). The developed questionnaire demonstrates satisfactory psychometric characteristics, correct functioning of statements and confirms the expected two-factor structure. The questionnaire consists of 10 statements and includes two factors: (1) studying STEM and career in STEM are more suitable for men than women; (2) work in STEM is not compatible with the female role model of taking care of the family. The selected factor model correlates with theoretical ideas about stereotypes: stereotypes about girls' abilities in technical disciplines and stereotypes about female role model. The developed questionnaire "STEM stereotypes" will make it possible to fix them, evaluate their relationship with other psychological constructs (for example, motivation) and academic achievements, correct the educational and career trajectory, thereby possibly contributing to the consolidation women in STEM.
About the Author
N. Lebedeva
Kazan Federal University; Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nataliya Lebedeva
Kazan
Moscow
References
1. Beasley, M. A., & Fischer, M. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15(4), 427-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3
2. Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(8), 3157-3162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014871108
3. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications Inc.
4. Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 656-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611405218
5. Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (Maryland): National Institutes of Health, 2013, 541-545.
6. Deemer, E. D., Lin, C., & Soto, C. (2016). Stereotype threat and women’s science motivation: Examining the disidentification effect. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(4), 637-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715616064
7. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 136(1), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018053
8. Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2005). Personality traits, types, and disorders: an examination of the relationship between three self‐report measures. European Journal of Personality, 19(3), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.543
9. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
10. Grigorieva, N. S., & Chubarova, T. V. (2018). To leave impossible to stay: Life strategies of women who left stem‐professions. Zhenshhina v rossijskom obshhestve - Woman in Russian Society, 4(89), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2018.4.7
11. Hakim, C. (2006). Women, careers, and work-life preferences. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 34(3), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880600769118
12. Hirnstein, M., Andrews, L. C., & Hausmann, M. (2014). Gender-stereotyping and cognitive sex differences in mixed-and same-sex groups. Archives of sexual behavior, 43(8), 1663-1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0311-5
13. Holling, H., & Preckel, F. (2005). Self-estimates of intelligence––methodological approaches and gender differences. Personality and individual differences, 38(3), 503-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.003
14. Jacobs, J. A., & Winslow, S. E. (2004). Overworked faculty: Job stresses and family demands. The ANNALS of the American academy of Political and Social Science, 596(1), 104-129.
15. Kelly Services (2015). Women in STEM. How and why an inclusive strategy is critical to closing the STEM talent gap. Retrieved from https://www.kellyservices.com/global/siteassets/3-kelly-global-services/uploadedfiles/3-kelly_global_services/content/kgwi_women20in20stem_final.pdf
16. Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007) Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math related outcomes: A prospective study of female college students. Psychological Science, 18(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01841.x
17. Leaper, C. (2015). Do I belong?: Gender, peer groups, and STEM achievement. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 166-179.
18. Lebedeva, N., Ismatullina, V., Sheymardanov, Sh., & Zhussipbek, T. (2022). The Teacher is a Guide or Barrier to Mathematics: Case Studies in Russia, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. Education and Self Development, 17(3), 278-295. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.17.3.20
19. Lee, T. L., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2010). Next gen ambivalent sexism: Converging correlates, causality in context, and converse causality, an introduction to the special issue. Sex Roles, 62(7-8), 395-404.
20. Lubinski, D. S., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Sex Differences in Personal Attributes for the Development of Scientific Expertise. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 79-100). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-007
21. Lund, S., Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., Smit, S., Ellingrud, K., Meaney, M., & Robinson, O. (2021, February 18). The future of work after COVID-19. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/the-future-of-work-after-covid-19
22. Maloshonok, N. G., & Shcheglova, I. A. (2020). Role of gender stereotypes in student dropout of STEM programs. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: jekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny – Monitoring Public Opinion: Economic and Social Change, 2(156), 273-292. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.2.945
23. Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2011). Implicit social cognitions predict sex differences in math engagement and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1125-1156. https//doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410683
24. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math= male, me= female, therefore math≠ me. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(1), 44-57.
25. Parsons, J. E., Meece, J. L., Adler, T. F., & Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Sex differences in attributions and learned helplessness. Sex Roles, 8(4), 421-432.
26. Pseekos, A. C., Dahlen, E. R., & Levy, J. J. (2008). Development of the academic stereotype threat inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 41(1), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2008.11909818
27. Ramsey, L. R., Sekaquaptewa, D. (2011). Changing stereotypes, changing grades: A longitudinal study of stereotyping during a college math course. Social Psychology of Education, 14(3), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9150-y
28. Rosstat (2020). Zhenshchiny i muzhchiny rossii. Statisticheskij sbornik – Women and Men. Statistical Digest.
29. Savinskaya, O. B., & Lebedeva, N. V. (2020). Why women leave STEM: The role of stereotypes. Zhenshhina v rossiĭskom obshhestve – Woman in Russian society, 2, 62-75. https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2020.2.6
30. Savinskaya, O. B., Lebedeva, N. V., & Vilkova, K. A. (2022). Gender Stereotypes and Women Strategies in STEM: A Multidisciplinary Review. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 20(3), 505-520. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-3-505-520
31. Smyth, F. L., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). On the gender–science stereotypes held by scientists: Explicit accord with gender-ratios, implicit accord with scientific identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 415-434. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00415
32. Spencer S. J. (1993). The effect of stereotype vulnerability on women's math performance [Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan]. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9332169
33. Starr, C. R. (2018). 'I’m not a science nerd!' STEM Stereotypes, Identity, and Motivation Among Undergraduate Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318793848
34. Steffens, M. C., & Jelenec, P. (2011). Separating implicit gender stereotypes regarding math and language: Implicit ability stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and women. Sex roles, 64, 324-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9924-x
35. UNESCO (2020). United Nations Association of America Global Classrooms Project - mini-training Topic: Gender and Science Committee. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/240763.pdf
Review
For citations:
Lebedeva N. Stereotypes as a Possible Predictor of Women's Underrepresentation in STEM: STEM Stereotypes Questionnaire Development. Education and Self-Development. 2023;18(2):118-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.2.09. EDN: YOKCLL
Views:
5
Email this article 