Development of the Screening Test to Assess Reading Proficiency in Tatar Language among Primary Schoolchildren

Reading is one of the most important cognitive skills that is acquired during preschool and early school years. To determine the level of reading development in bilingual children, it is necessary to assess their reading abilities in both languages, which requires appropriate assessment tools. The goal of the research was to develop a screening test for assessing reading proficiency in primary schoolchildren in the Tatar language. The screening test was developed in two forms: Forms A and B. A total of 105 schoolchildren aged 7 to 11 years (M = 9.89, SD = 0.7, 49% girls) from three multilingual schools in Kazan participated in the pilot study. In line with the study’s objective, a psychometric analysis of both test forms was conducted with the use of classical test theory. The psychometric analysis showed that the developed screening test is a reliable tool. With a few exceptions, the items in both test forms demonstrated an acceptable level of difficulty and discrimination. The results of the initial pilot study indicated that both forms of the test have comparable psychometric characteristics. The next stages of the research should include the development of a digital version of the test, further piloting on larger samples – including different age groups of bilingual children with varying levels of Tatar language proficiency – as well as the application of probabilistic psychometric models. 

1. Auer, M., Gruber, G., Mayringer, H., & Wimmer, H. (2005). SLS 5-8. Salzburger Lese-Screening für die Klassenstufen [SLS 5-8. Salzburg Reading Screening for Grade Levels]. Verlag Hans Huber.

2. Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3(3), 296–322.

3. Bukhalenkova, D. A., Veraksa, A. N., Guseva, U. D., & Oshchepkova, E. S. (2024). The Relationship Between Vocabulary Size and Emotion Understanding in Children Aged 5–7 Years. Vestnik

4. Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya – Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 47(4), 150– 176. https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-24-44

5. Center for Language and Brain. (n.d.). https://www.hse.ru/en/neuroling/lextale

6. Corpus of the Tatar Language. (n.d.). https://www.corpus.tatar/

7. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2006). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Cengage Learning.

8. Dürscheid, C. (2006). Einführung in die Schriftlinguistik [Introduction to Writing Linguistics]. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

9. Federal State Statistics Service. (2020). All-Russian Population Census 2020: Volume 5 – National composition and language proficiency. https://rosstat.gov.ru/vpn/2020/Tom5_Nacionalnyj_sostav_i_vladenie_yazykami

10. Golovin, G. (2014). MyVocab. https://myvocab.info/howitworks

11. Gulliksen, H. (1950). Experimental methods of obtaining test reliability. In H. Gulliksen, Theory of mental tests (pp. 193–218). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/13240-015

12. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. SAGE Publications.

13. Harvill, L. M. (1991). Standard error of measurement: an NCME instructional module on. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(2), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00195.x

14. Ibragimov, G. (2020). Explanatory dictionary of the Tatar language. Tatar Book Publishing House.

15. Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage.

16. Kolbeneva, M. G., & Aleksandrov, Yu. I. (2011). Emotions and Russian adjectives. 1. Adjectives related to vision, hearing, taste and olfaction. Ehksperimental'naya psikhologiya – Experimental Psychology, 4(1), 17–27.

17. Kornev, A. N., & Ishimova, O. A. (2010). Methods for diagnosing dyslexia in children: A methodological guide. Polytechnic University Press.

18. Korzhenevskaya, A. Yu., Gumova, N. D., Khanova, A. F., Ogly, B. A., Bguasheva, A. A., Protopova, M. A., Makerova, S. R., & Dragoi, O. V. (2025). Visual word recognition in Adyghe-Russian bilinguals according to the Rey test. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 512, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/512/3

19. Laposhina, A. N., Lebedeva, M. Y., & Berlin Khenis, A. A. (2022). Word frequency and text complexity: an eye-tracking study of young Russian readers. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 26(2), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-30084

20. Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0

21. Lopukhina, A., Akinina, J., Chrabaszcz, A., Khudyakova, M., Korkina, I., Yurchenko, A., & Dragoy, O. (2019). Test for assessment of language development in Russian «KORABLIK». In Proceedings of the Satellite of AMLaP Conference “Typical and Atypical Language Development Symposium” (pp. 30–31). HSE University.

22. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (2008). Statistical theories of mental test scores. IAP.

23. Lüdtke, J., Froehlich, E., Jacobs, A. M., & Hutzler, F. (2019). The SLS-Berlin: validation of a German computer-based screening test to measure reading proficiency in early and late adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01682

24. Lüdtke, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). The emotion potential of simple sentences: additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137

25. Medyntsev, A. A. (2017). The influence of implicit cue on information processing in anagram solving task. Ehksperimental'naya psikhologiya – Experimental Psychology, 10(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2017100103

26. Morgan, W. A. (1939). A test for the significance of the difference between the two variances in a sample from a normal bivariate population. Biometrika, 31(1-2), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/31.1-2.13

27. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

28. Pitman, E. J. G. (1939). A note on normal correlation. Biometrika, 31(1-2), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/31.1-2.9

29. Schrank, F. A., & Wendling, B. J. (2018). The Woodcock-Johnson IV: Tests of Cognitive Abilities, Tests of Oral Language, Tests of Achievement. In D. P. Flanagan & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 383–462). Guilford Publications.

30. Shakory, S., Krenca, K., Marinova-Todd, S. H., & Chen, X. (2023). A 3-year longitudinal investigation of the overlap and stability of English and French word reading difficulties in French immersion children. Annals of Dyslexia, 73, 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-022-00265-1

31. Skorupiński, P. M. (2015). American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Standards for educational and psychological testing. Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny, 238(4), 201–203.

32. Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Nation, K. (2022). The science of reading: A handbook. John Wiley & Sons.

33. Sorokova, M. G., Kardanova, E. Yu., Radchikova, N. P., & Fedorov, V. V. (2024). Guidelines for standardizing psychodiagnostic tools: Requirements and quality assessment: Textbook. Moscow State University of Psychology and Education (MGPPU).

34. Szmrecsányi, B. M. (2004). On operationalizing syntactic complexity. In Le poids des mots. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis, 2 (pp. 1032– 1039). Louvain-la-Neuve.

35. Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2014). Salzburger Lese-Screening für die Schulstufen 2-9 [Salzburg Reading Screening for Grades 2–9]. Huber.

36. Zakiev, M. Z. (2016). Tatar grammar: In three volumes (2nd ed.). Ibragimov Institute of Language, Literature and Art.