Speech Behavior Patterns of First-Year Students: An Empirical Study of the Intrapersonal Context
https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.20.2.10
EDN: VOLLBY
Abstract
The behavior of the subject of educational activity is a topical problem. To understand the behavior of the subject of educational activity in the process of mastering higher education programs, it is necessary to study the personal factors of speech action that determine the profile of behavior. The purpose of the article is to describe the patterns of speech behavior of the subject of educational activity, due to the influence of personal factors, represented in the speech act on the basis of the results of empirical research. The research used methods that allow to study the psychophysiological, psychological and social aspects of a speech act: methods for assessing self-sufficiency and selfregulation of the computerized system «AKorD», Co-therapeutic computer system «Kelly-98»; statistical procedures were used: descriptive statistics, cluster and correlation analysis. The study involved 333 first-year students of Yekaterinburg universities (N=333; M=19,71). The revealed significant correlation for individual combinations of self-sufficiency and self-regulation scales in clusters, a statistically significant distribution of the real/ideal self by types of communication, the distribution of subsystem scales in clusters at the operational level, preferred roles in the conjugation of the real/ideal self and the type of communication in each cluster made it possible to describe the patterns of speech behavior due to personal factors, and the five profiles of possible behavior associated with them subject in the context of educational activities. The described behavior profiles can be used to predict the behavior of the subject of educational activity, in the design of pedagogical technologies in methodological, substantive and organizational aspects. The novelty and practical significance of the study lies in the study of the personal factors of a speech act and the description of the predicted behavior of the subject of educational activity.
About the Authors
T. Vershinina
Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana Vershinina
Ekaterinburg
N. Zhukova
Ural Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia Zhukova
Ekaterinburg
T. Valieva
Ural Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana Valieva
Ekaterinburg
References
1. Ahmedov, A. B. (2009). Features of the self-concept in adolescents who were in the war zone and in their peers living in a stable social situation. Psychological research, 2(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v2i4.989
2. Artyomov, V. A. (1969). Psychology of teaching foreign languages. Prosveshchenie. Bergdahl, N., Fors, U., Hernwall, P. & Knutsson, O. (2018). The Use of Learning Technologies and Student Engagement in Learning Activities. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2018-02-04
3. Bleichmar, H. (1999). Fundamentos y aplicaciones del enfoque modular-transformacional [Fundamentals and applications of the modular-transformational approach]. Aperturas psicoanalíticas revista internacional de psicoanálisis, 1.
4. Borisova, I. N. (2019). Russian colloquial dialogue: structure and dynamics. Librocom.
5. Chen, Sh. (2022). Research on the teaching mode of «moral integration classroom» of language courses in colleges and universities from the perspective of educational psychology. Psychiatria Danubina, 34(4), 29–877. https://hrcak.srce.hr/en/file/409337
6. Dewi, R., Verawati, I., Sukamton, A., Hakim, H., Burhaein E., & Lourenço, C. C. V. (2023). The Impact of Basic Motion Activities on Social Interaction, in Elementary School Students. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 11(1), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2023.110117
7. Engel, G. L. (2012). The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Psychodyn Psychiatry, 40(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2012.40.3.377
8. Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A manual for repertory grid technique. John Wiley & Sons. İlçin, N., Tomruk, M., Yeşilyaprak, S. S., Karadibak, D., & Savcı, S. (2018). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in TURKISH physiotherapy students. BMC Med Educ., 18, 291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1400-2
9. Karasik, V. I. (2002). Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Peremena.
10. Karaulov, Yu. N. (1987). Russian language and linguistic personality. Nauka.
11. Kelly, G. (2020). The psychology of personal constructs. Routledge.
12. Kholodnaya, M. A. (2004). Cognitive styles. On the nature of the individual mind. Piter.
13. Klochko, V.E. (2004). Communicative environment as a factor in the formation of human mental space. Mentality and communicative environment in a transitive society. Tomsk State University.
14. Klochko, V.E. (2005). Self-organization in psychological systems: problems of formation of the mental space of the individual (introduction to transspective analysis). Tomsk State University.
15. Kostić-Bobanović, M. (2019). Perceived emotional intelligence and self-efficacy among novice and experienced foreign language teachers. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 1200– 1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1710232
16. Kurtseva, Z. I. (2017). Speech act: rhetorical and methodological aspects. Moscow Teacher State University.
17. Labov, W. (2006). Narrative pre-construction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.07lab
18. Li, W., & Zhao, J. (2021). Perspective of the Relation between Subject and Object in Educational Activities for Innovative Education. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(7), 452–461. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.97032.
19. Lotman, Yu.M. (2000). Semiosphere. Art-SPB.
20. Mahmud, R., Syahrul, & Mangesa, R. T. (2021). Interaction patterns and blended learning activities using the Moodle platform during a pandemic in vocational high school. Proceedings of the 6th progressive and fun education international conference, 2438(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0071355
21. Matveeva, T. V. (2018). On a method for identifying valuable information in conversational dialogue. Nauchnyj dialog – Scientific Dialogue, 10, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2018-10-89-101
22. Morosanova, V. I. (2021). Conscious self-regulation as a meta-resource for achieving goals and solving life problems. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14: Psychology, 1, 3–37. https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2021.01.01
23. Mukhametzyanova, F.Sh., Kamaleeva, A.R., Gruzkova, S.Yu., & Khadiullina, R.R. (2016).
24. Organization of interaction between subjects of the educational process when using distance learning platforms. Open Education, 20(3), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2016-3-36-42
25. Ogannisyan, L., Kotov, S., Akopyan, M., & Borzilov, Y. (2019). Personal determinants of style features of pedagogical interaction as a factor of successful professional activity of the teacher. SHS Web Conf., 70 (02010). https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197002010
26. Peshkov, I. V. (1996). M. M. Bakhtin: from the philosophy of action to the rhetoric of action. Labirint.
27. Subakir, A. (2017). Concept of Educational Interaction in Education: In Sociological Perspective. Didaktika Religia, 5(2), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v5i2.867
28. Tikhankina, I. A. (1998). Action as a unit of analysis of student activity in contextual learning [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. Research center for problems of quality of training of specialists]. http://www.dslib.net/psixologia-vozrasta/postupok-kak-edinica-analiza-dejatelnosti-studentovv-kontekstnom-obuchenii.html#1240333 (date of reference: 28.07.24)
29. Vannovskaya, O. V. (2015). Computerized anti-corruption diagnostic system «AKorD». IMATON.
30. Vannovskaya, O. V. (2025). Psychology of corrupt behavior of civil servants. Publishing house Yurait.
31. Verbitsky, A. A. (2018). Psychological and pedagogical foundations of contextual education. In A. A. Verbitsky (Eds.) Psychology and pedagogy of contextual education (рр.7–88). Nestor-Istoriya.
32. Witkin, H.A., &Goodenough, D.R. (1976). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1976(1), i–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1976.tb01098.x
33. Yi-xuan, F. (2016). Teaching Speech Acts in EFL Classrooms: An Implicit Pedagogy. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(7), 515–520. https://doi.org:10.17265/1539-8072/2016.07.002
34. Zimnyaya, I. A. (1985). Psychological aspects of teaching speaking a foreign language: A book for teachers. Prosveshchenie.
Review
For citations:
Vershinina T., Zhukova N., Valieva T. Speech Behavior Patterns of First-Year Students: An Empirical Study of the Intrapersonal Context. Education and Self-Development. 2025;20(2):125-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.20.2.10. EDN: VOLLBY
Views:
18
Email this article 