Research the Future Teachers’ Digital Competence in the Context of Personality Pedagogy
https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.1.13
Abstract
The relevance of the study is explained by the digital transformation of society and the digitalization of education, its opportunities and risks. The key idea of the research is to reveal the phenomenon of students’ digital competence in the context of personality pedagogy. Namely, through the skills and competencies in the areas of individuality that arise when students apply digital technologies in their training. Data collection was carried out using self-assessment. Students assessed skills and competencies in the areas of individuality. The factor analysis showed that the digital competence of students is associated with the subject-practical sphere, existential sphere and the sphere of selfregulation.
About the Authors
T. Grebenyuk
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana Grebenyuk
Kaliningrad
S. Nesyna
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana Nesyna
Kaliningrad
N. Ermakova
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezhda Ermakova
Kaliningrad
O. Kaygorodova
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga Kaygorodova
Kaliningrad
References
1. Aimaletdinov, T. A., Baimuratova, L. R., Zaitseva, О. А., Imaeva, G. R., & Spiridonova, L. V. (2019).
2. Digital Literacy of Teachers in Russia. Readiness to use digital technologies in teaching. NAFI. Ananyev, B. G. (2001). Man as a subject of knowledge. Piter.
3. Andreev, V. I. (1996). Pedagogy of creative self-development. Innovation course. Izd-vo Kazanskogo universiteta.
4. Andryukhina, L., Sadovnikov, N., Semenova, S., Sumina, T., & Tserkovnikova, N. (2021). Ecosystem functions of individual style in a digital educational environment. TEM Journal, 10(1), 405-413. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM101-51
5. Atlas of new professions 2.0 (2015). Skolkovo. http://www.skolkovo.ru/public/media/documents/research/sedec/SKOLKOVO_SEDeC_Atlas_2.0.pdf
6. Bodalev, A. A. (1998). The peak in the development of an adult person: Characteristics and conditions of achievements. Flinta: Nauka.
7. Butenko, V., Polunin, K., Kotov, I., Sycheva, E., Stepanenko, A., Zanina, A., Lomp, S., Rudenko, V., & Topolskaya, E. (2017). Russia 2025: From staff to talent. The Boston Consulting Group, Inc.
8. Cabero-Almenara, J., Romero-Tena, R., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2020). Evaluation of teacher digital competence frameworks through expert judgement: The use of the expert competence coefficient. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.578
9. Colás-Bravo, P., Reyes-de-Cózar, S., & Conde-Jiménez, J. (2019). The development of the digital teaching competence from a sociocultural approach. Comunicar, 27(61), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.3916/C61-2019-02
10. Dvoretskaya, I. V., Uvarov, A. Yu., & Vikhrev, V. V. (2020). The models of renewal of general education in an evolving digital environment: An annotated bibliography. Torus Press. https://doi.org/10.30826/94588-284-3
11. Ermakova, N. I. (2017). Implementation of the concept of pedagogy of individuality in the professional training of future teachers. In Personality Pedagogy: Achievements and Development Prospects (pp. 143-155). Izd-vo KOIRO.
12. Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449-2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
13. Fisher, T., Denning, T., Higgins, C., & Loveless, A. (2012). Teachers knowing how to use technology: Exploring a conceptual framework for purposeful learning activity. Curriculum Journal, 23(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.703492
14. Grebenyuk, O. S., & Grebenyuk, T. B. (2000). Fundamentals of personality pedagogy. Izd-vo Kalingradskogo un-ta.
15. Grebenyuk, T. B. (2017). Formation of the personality of the student – the future teacher. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
16. Grebenyuk, T. B. (2020). Future teacher’s training to the digitalization of the education as a pedagogical problem. Kaliningradskij vestnik obrazovaniya. – Kaliningrad Education Bulletin, 2(6), 20-27.
17. Grebenyuk, T.B. (2000). Formation of the personality of the future teacher in the process of professional training. Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl, 452 p.
18. Gurevich, P. S. (2009). Psychology of Personality. Yuniti-Dana.
19. Hinrichsen, J., & Coombs, A. (2013). The five resources of critical digital literacy: A framework for curriculum integration. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21334
20. Klebansky, A., & Fraser, S. (2013). A strategic approach to curriculum design for information literacy in teacher education: Implementing an information literacy conceptual framework. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(11), 103-125. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n11.5
21. Knowles, M. (1980). Modern practice of adult education. From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Moscow.
22. Lázaro Cantabrana, J., Usart Rodríguez, M., & Gisbert Cervera, M. (2019) Assessing Teacher Digital Competence: The Construction of an Instrument for Measuring the Knowledge of Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.370
23. Li, L., Worch, E., Zhou, Y., & Aguiton, R. (2015). How and why digital generation teachers use technology in the classroom: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2), https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090209
24. Loshkareva, E., Luksha, P., Ninenko, I., Smagin, I., & Sudakov, D. (2017). Skills of the future: What you need to know and be able to in a complex new world. https://spkurdyumov.ru/uploads/2017/10/navyki-budushhego-chto-nuzhno-znat-i-umet-v-novom-slozhnom-mire.pdf
25. Maksimova, M., Bezruchko, P., & Shatrov, Yu. (2016). Competencies of an uncertain future. Harvard Business Review Russia. https://hbr-russia.ru/karera/professionalnyy-i-lichnostnyy-rost/p26131/
26. Maslova, I. S. (2000). Human individuality: The philosophical aspect of the problem. [PhD thesis, Russian Academy of State Service at the President of Russian Federation]. https://www.dissercat.com/content/chelovecheskaya-individualnost-filosofskii-aspekt-problemy
27. Maudet, R. (2006). Rationalisierung nach Max Weber, Ursprünge und Auswirkungen [Rationalization according to Max Weber. Origins and effects]. GRIN Verlag.
28. Merlin, V. S. (1986). Essay on the Integral Personality. Pedagogika.
29. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 6, 1017-1054.
30. Nesyna, S. V. (2019). Structural and substantive characteristics of the individuality. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik – Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 5, 25-31. https://doi.org/10.24411/1813-145X-2019-10518
31. Novella-García, C., & Cloquell-Lozano, A. (2021). The ethical dimension of digital competence in teacher training. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3529-3541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10436-z
32. Ottenbreit-Leſtwich, A., & Kimmons, R. (2020). The K-12 educational technology handbook. EdTech Books.
33. Pacheco, B. (2018). The rise of the human digital brain: How multidirectional thinking is changing the way we learn. Information Age Publishing.
34. Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts – a review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1005-1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3
35. Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology and education: A model for technology and transformation. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/puentedura_tte.pdf
36. Rezvitskii, I. I. (1973). Philosophical foundations of personality theory. Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta.
37. Rozhkov, M. I. (2002). The concept of existential pedagogy. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik – Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 33(4), 1-15.
38. Rubinshtein, S. L. (2003). Being and Consciousness. Man and world. Piter.
39. Solar, M., Sabattin, J., & Parada, M. (2013). A maturity model for assessing the use of ICT in school education. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 206-218.
40. Starkey, L. (2020). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867
41. Yeung, A., Tay. Е, Hui, C., Lin, J. H., & Low, E. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ motivation in using digital technology. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n3.1
Review
For citations:
Grebenyuk T., Nesyna S., Ermakova N., Kaygorodova O. Research the Future Teachers’ Digital Competence in the Context of Personality Pedagogy. Education and Self-Development. 2023;18(1):186-200. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.1.13
Views:
6
Email this article 