Assessment of the Quality of Norm-Setting in the Educational System in a Modern School
https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.1.11
Abstract
The results of the educational process oſten cause criticism from the state, parental and pedagogical communities and society as a whole. This is due to the fact that norms created at the institutional level of the education system do not always allow achieving goals at the procedural level.
It is the school teacher, as a key subject of educational activity, who is able to give the most reasonable answer to the question if the existing norms really help to achieve educational goals. In this regard, the purpose of the study is to assess the quality of norms and norm-setting in the field of education and to determine the possibilities and prospects for the deliberate participation of the pedagogical community in it.
An expert survey of practicing teachers (N = 87) was conducted with the help of Google Forms service. Respondents evaluated the norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation; federal laws; codes of pedagogical ethics, etc.
The experts' assessment of the norms showed that normative regulation of the sphere of education set the important priorities in upbringing. However, there are problems associated with the implementation of these priorities due to excessive bureaucratization; limitation of the creative potential of teachers; unwillingness to constructively interact with other subjects of norm-setting, etc. The majority of teachers cannot influence the creation, change or abolition of norms that regulate the educational process at school (with the exception of the local norms). But they are ready to actively participate in the public discussion of the norms regulating upbringing.
The research results can be used to further study of the education system through the prism of norm-setting activity, and can also be useful for the formation and implementation of mechanisms for the participation of the pedagogical community in determining the value-normative priorities of upbringing.
About the Authors
E. Koval
The Middle Volga Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia); National Research Mordovia State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina Koval
Saransk
A. Sychev
National Research Mordovia State University; Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey Sychev
Saransk
Tyumen
N. Zhadunova
National Research Mordovia State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nataliya Zhadunova
Saransk
References
1. Anscombe, G. E. M. (2008). Modern moral philosophy. Logos – Logos, 64(1), 70-91.
2. Apressyan, R. G. (2019). А conception of social-emotional instruction and objectives of moral education. Voprosy Psychologii, 1, 29-39.
3. Arzamasov, Yu. G. (2015). Results of rulemaking. Vestnik kostromskogo universiteta – Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 21(4), 189-194.
4. Bakshtanovsky, V. I., & Sogomonov, Y. V. (2002). Ethics and ethos of education. NII prikladnoy etiki; Tsentr prikladnoy etiki.
5. Baranov, V. M., & Trofimov, V. V. (2015). Personal in law-making: utopia, anthropological resource or proper technical and legal means to improve quality. Yuridicheskaya nauka I praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii – Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod academy of the Ministry of internal affairs of Russia, 30(2), 9-18.
6. Bauman, Z. (2008). Liquid modernity. Piter Publ.
7. Darmodekhin, S. V. (2017). Up-bringing as a matter of priority for the society and state. Akmeologija – Acmeology, 2, 34-40.
8. Demakova, I. D., & Shustova, I. Yu. (2021). Systematic Approach for Efficient Use of Research Methods in Educational Theory. Obrazovaniye i samorazvitiye – Education and Self Development, 16(3), 249-260. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.3.22
9. Devjak, T., & Krajncan, M. (2009). Education in public schools as a process of constructing human personality and individual social growth. Didactica slovenica-pedagoska obzorja, 24(2), 44-59.
10. Domina, T., Gibbs, B. G., Nunn, L., & Penner, A. (2009). Education and society: An introduction to key issues in the sociology of Education. University of California Press.
11. Drobnitskii, O. G. (2002). Moral philosophy: Selected Works. Gardariki.
12. Gusev, D. A. (2017). Teacher and scientist. Pedagogika I prosveshchenie – Pedagogy and Education, 3, 80-94. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0676.2017.3.23332
13. Guseynov, A. A. (2020). Ethics and culture. Articles, notes, speeches. SPbGUP.
14. Jackson, P. (2016). Life in Classrooms. HSE University Publ.
15. Klochkova, L. I. (2018). Development of the school upbringing system: systematic changes and innovative resources. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija – Modern Problems of Science and Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.27422
16. Kruglov, V. V. (2014). Problems of upbringing in school. Sotsial'naya pedagogika – Social Pedagogy, 6, 60-65.
17. Krimovsckaya, I. A. (2015). Educational rule-making and its place in the activities of head of a professional educational organization. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy zhurnal – International Research Journal, 38(7), 36-41.
18. Levanova, E. A., Mudrik, A. V., Seryakova, S. B., Pushkareva, T. V., Tarabakina, L. V., & Zvonova, E. V. (2020). Education as a process of effective functioning of the “personality – group – society” metasystem. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Herald of Vyatka State University, 137(3), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.25730/VSU.7606.20.041
19. Lidaka, A. (2014). Upbringing as a necessity and freedom. International Scientific Conference on Society, Integration, Education. Society, Integration, Education, 3, 254-264. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol3.706
20. Luman, N., & Lenzen, D (2002). Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaſt. Suhrkamp.
21. MacIntyre, A. (2000). Aſter virtue: A study of moral theory. Delovaya kniga.
22. Maxwell, B. (2017). Codes of Professional Conduct and Ethics Education for Future Teachers. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 24(4), 323-347. https://doi.org/10.7202/1070690ar
23. Mikhaylova, E. A. (2011). Problems and contradictions of upbringing in modern school. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 20: Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie – The Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 20. Pedagogical Education, 2, 121-127.
24. Mudrik, A. V. (2004). Education as a social institution. Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 3, 22-31.
25. Mudrik, A. V. (2016). Socialization as a socio-psychological phenomenon. Sotsial'naya pedagogika – Social Pedagogy, 1/2, 4-15.
26. Selivanova, N. L., & Parfyonova I. S. (2021). Scientific and Methodological Support for Upbringing in School. Obrazovaniye i samorazvitiye – Education and Self Development, 16(3), 238-248. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.3.20
27. Soloviev, P. (2019). Legal liability for defective rulemaking. Vestnik Polockogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya D. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki – Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and Legal Sciences, 6(1), 116-124.
28. Titarenko, A. I. (1984). Anti-ideas: Experience of socio-ethical analysis. Politizdat.
29. Tolstov, N. S. (2019). Common approaches to standard-setting activities of the school. Simvol nauki – Symbol of Science, 6, 51-54.
30. Toshchenko, Zh. T. (2016). Life world and its meanings. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – Sociological Studies, 381(1), 5-17.
31. Tsarkov, I. I. (2015). The backbone factors of Christian rulemaking. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva – Vestnik of Volzhsky University named aſter V.N. Tatishchev, 82(2), 292-310.
32. Tsypin, V. (2009). Canon law. Sretenskii monastyr’ Publ.
Review
For citations:
Koval E., Sychev A., Zhadunova N. Assessment of the Quality of Norm-Setting in the Educational System in a Modern School. Education and Self-Development. 2023;18(1):151-167. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.1.11
Views:
6
Email this article 