Features of Self-regulated Learning of Male and Female Students

The effectiveness of activity depends on the ability to achieve the set goals, to realize personal potential, and to maintain a high level of motivation. The research relevance is determined by the differential psychological features of self-regulated learning, in particular the gender characteristics of this process. The paper aims to identify the gender characteristics of self-regulated learning among the students of mathematical specialties. We have put forward a hypothesis that male and female students differ in the degree of self-regulating behavior.

Seventy-nine students majoring in mathematics (38 male and 41 female students) took part in the research. The different questionnaires were used to obtain the data.

The findings revealed that the female students with a high level of self-regulation demonstrate the abilities specific to self-regulation, i.e. flexibility, programming, evaluation of results, planning and modeling. The young men with a high level of self-regulation demonstrate such abilities as evaluation of results, modeling, and planning. The participants differed significantly on the scale of self-esteem motivation. The girls scored higher than boys. The students of both genders had average scores for the indicators of individual components of self-attitude, as well as the “behavior” indicator. The reliability of differences in the diagnosed indicators was not detected.

It is shown that the core components of self-regulated learning for girls include: planning, modeling, a general level of self-regulation, and self-confidence. For boys, planning, modeling, flexibility, a general level of self-regulation, self-confidence, self-worth, self-attachment and behavior. The obtained results will help to differentiate the training of male and female students majoring in mathematics, taking into account the components of self-regulated learning.

1. Blokhina, T. S. (2020). Style features of self-regulation of educational activity of college students. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya – World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 6. https://mirnauki.com/PDF/121PSMN620.pdf

2. Brandon, P. R., & Newton, W. I. (1985). The superiority of girls over boys in mathematics achievement in Hawaii [Paper presentation]. The AERA Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, USA.

3. Callahan, L. G., & Clements, D. F. (1984). Sex differences in rote-counting ability on entry to first grade: Some observations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(5), 378-382.

4. Dossey, J. A., Mullis, I. V. S., Lindquist, M. M, & Chambers, D. L. (1988). The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up? (Report No. 17-M-Ol). Educational Testing Service.

5. Friedman, L. (1989). Mathematics and the gender gap: A meta-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in mathematical tasks. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 185-213.

6. Gordeeva, T. O., Sychev, O. A., & Osin, E. N. (2014). Academic motivation scales questionnaire. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 35(4), 98-109.

7. Guthke, J. (1972). Zur Diagnostik der intellektuellen Lernfahigkeit [On the Diagnostics of Intellectual Learning Ability]. Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaſten.

8. Hawn, H. C., Ellet, C. D., & Des Jardines, L. (1981). Differences in mathematics achievement between males and females in grades 1-3 [Paper presentation]. EERA Annual Conference, Philadelphia, Pa, USA.

9. Hiemstra, R. (1994). Self-directed learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). Retrieved August 30, 2007, from http://home.twcny.rr.com/hiemstra/sdlhdbk.html

10. Kirgintseva, N. S. (2003). Self-regulated education of students of linguistic specialties in didactic information environments [PhD thesis, Stavropol State University]. https://www.dissercat.com/content/samoreguliruemoe-obuchenie-studentov-lingvisticheskikh-spetsialnostei-vusloviyakh-didaktich/

11. Klaus, G. (1987). Gender differences in girls and boys. In I. V. Ravich-Shcherbo (Ed.), Introduction to the differential psychology of learning (pp. 86-92). Pedagogika.

12. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self‐directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. Cambridge Book Co.

13. Kulshmanova, A. K. (2020). Self-regulated learning as a factor in the individualization of undergraduates. In G. M. Fedosimov (Ed.), Individualization of training and education of bachelors and undergraduates: theory, methodology and practice – Collection of scientific articles of the International scientific and practical conference (pp. 138-143). Kurganskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet.

14. Kulturel-Konak, S., D'Allegro, M. L., & Dickinson, S. (2011). Review of gender differences in learning styles: suggestions for stem education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 4(3), 9-18.

15. Morosanova, V. I., & Konoz, E. M. (2000). Style self-regulation of human behavior. Voprosy psikhologii, 2, 118-127.

16. Posokhova, S. T., & Solovyov, S. L. (2008). Handbook of a practical psychologist. AST Khranitel.

17. Prokhorov, A. O. (2004). Methods for diagnosing and measuring the mental states of a person. PER SE.

18. Prokhorov, A. O., Chernov, A. V., Yusupov, M. G., & Reshetnikova, I. S. (2021). Efficiency of mental self-regulation of final year university students during the exam. Psikhologiya. Psikhofiziologiya – Psychology. Psychophysiology, 14(4), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps210405

19. Ptukha, M. V., Davydova, Yu. A., & Panchenko, E. M. (2013). Comparative analysis of self-regulation of adolescents and students of different sexes. Vestnik KRSU, 13(3), 150-153.

20. Shakirova, L. R., Prokhorov, A. O., Falileeva, M. V., & Yusupov, M. G. (2020). Possibilities for the implementation of self-regulated learning in the context of digitalization of the higher education system. In Theory and practice of informatization of education: implementation of results and development prospects – The collection of scientific papers of the jubilee International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 35th anniversary of the formation of informatization of domestic education (pp. 684-694). Izdatel'stvo SGU.

21. Shvetsova, V. A., & Sharapov, A. O. (2019). Stylistic features of self-regulation in studentspsychologists. Problems of modern pedagogical education. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya, 63-3, 341-346.

22. Siegel, L. S. (1968). The development of the ability to process information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6(3), 368-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(68)90118-5

23. Stockard, J., & Wood, J. W. (1984). The myth of female underachievement: A reexamination of sex differences in academic underachievement. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 825-838.

24. Stotskaya, V. E., & Kalatskaya, N. N. (2020). Inter-gender features of students attitude to the education process. In R. A. Valeeva (Ed.), European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 745-754). https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.01.81/

25. Weinert, F. (1982). Selbstersteuertes lerner als voraussetzung, methode und ziel des unterrichts [Self-directed learner as a prerequisite, method and goal of teaching]. Unterrichtswissenshat, 10(2), 99-110.

26. Wentzel, K. R. (1988). Gender differences in math and English achievement: A longitudinal study. Sex Roles, 18(11-12), 691-699.

27. Wittig, М. A., & Petersen, А. С. (1979). Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning: developmental issues. Academic Press Inc.

28. Zamyatnina, E. S. (2017). Gender-related differences in speciality choices in Russia. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial'nyye peremeny – Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 139(3), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2017.3.11

29. Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2