Изучение влияния социальной поддержки, cаморегуляции и самоконтроля на формирование нравственности у студентов университета
https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.20.2.06
EDN: NHUCDQ
Аннотация
В настоящее время в области образования большую озабоченность вызывают моральные вопросы, особенно буллинг и академическая нечестность. Цель данного исследования – изучить влияние социальной поддержки, саморегуляции и самоконтроля на уровень нравственности студентов. Это количественное исследование было проведено в рамках программы бакалавриата на факультете экономики в Государственном университете Медан (Universitas Negeri Medan, Индонезия). Девяносто девять студентов были отобраны для исследования с помощью метода случайной выборки. Гипотезы были подвергнуты анализу с использованием SmartPLS 3.2.8 для моделирования структурными уравнениями (SEM) на исследовательской модели. Для обеспечения качества и предварительного тестирования гипотез также проводились проверки достоверности и надежности данных исследований. Результаты показывают, что нравственность зависит от самоконтроля и социальной поддержки, включая косвенную социальную поддержку. Кроме того, социальная поддержка влияет на саморегуляцию, но не оказывает воздействия на самоконтроль. Исследование подтверждает значение как внутренних факторов, таких как самоконтроль, так и внешних, таких как социальная поддержка, в формировании нравственности у студентов университета.
Об авторах
Ревита ЮниИндонезия
Ревита Юни
Медан
Паска Дви Путра
Индонезия
Паска Дви Путра
Медан
Иво Сельвия Агусти
Индонезия
Иво Сельвия Агусти
Медан
Хендра Сапутра
Индонезия
Хендра Сапутра
Медан
Андри Зайнал
Индонезия
Андри Зайнал
Медан
Роза Тохири
Индонезия
Роза Тохири
Медан
Список литературы
1. Abd Rahim, N. A., Siah, Y. H., Tee, X. Y., & Siah, P. C. (2021). Smartphone Addiction: Its Relationships to Personality Traits and Types of Smartphone Use. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(1), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.165
2. Aslan, S. (2021). Analysis of Digital Literacy Self-Efficacy Levels of Pre-service Teachers. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.47
3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
4. Caprara, M., Giunta, L. Di, Bermúdez, J., & Caprara, G. V. (2020). How self-efficacy beliefs in dealing with negative emotions are associated to negative affect and to life satisfaction across gender and age. PLOS ONE, 15(11), e0242326. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0242326
5. Chin, W. W., & Dibbern, J. (2010). An Introduction to a Permutation Based Procedure for MultiGroup PLS Analysis: Results of Tests of Differences on Simulated Data and a Cross Cultural Analysis of the Sourcing of Information System Services Between Germany and the USA. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_8
6. Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships, January 1983, 37–67.
7. Eisenberg, J. (2004). To cheat or not to cheat: Effects of moral perspective and situational variables on students’ attitudes. Journal of Moral Education, 33(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724042000215276
8. Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015). New Look at Social Support: A Theoretical Perspective on Thriving through Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 19(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544222
9. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
10. Gui, A. K. W., Yasin, M., Abdullah, N. S. M., & Saharuddin, N. (2020). Roles of Teacher and Challenges in Developing Students’ Morality. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3 3C), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081606
11. Haber, A., & Runyon, R. P. (1984). Psychology of adjustment. Dorsey Press.
12. Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2011). Moral Identity: What Is It, How Does It Develop, and Is It Linked to Moral Action? Child Development Perspectives, 5(3), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00189.x
13. Harman, G. (2003). No Character or Personality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 87–94. Hidayah, R. (2021). Students’ Self -Adjustment, Self-Control, and Morality. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(1), 174–193.
14. Hirtenlehner, H., & Kunz, F. (2016). The interaction between self-control and morality in crime causation among older adults. European Journal of Criminology, 13(3), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815623567
15. Kennedy, J. A., Kray, L. J., & Ku, G. (2017). A social-cognitive approach to understanding gender differences in negotiator ethics: The role of moral identity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 138, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.11.003
16. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. In Guilford Press: Vol. Fourth Edi (Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.15353/cgjsc-rcessc.v1i1.25
17. Kumar, D., & Suppiah, S. D. K. (2023). MSMEs and SDGs: Evidence from Bangladesh. Sustainable Development Goals Series, Part F2800, 89–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4829-1_5
18. Li, Q., & Hu, G. (2023). Positive impacts of perceived social support on prosocial behavior: the chain mediating role of moral identity and moral sensitivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1234977. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2023.1234977
19. Limone, P., & Toto, G. A. (2022). Origin and Development of Moral Sense: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 887537. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.887537/BIBTEX
20. Schauster, E., Ferrucci, P., Tandoc, E., & Walker, T. (2021). Advertising Primed: How Professional Identity Affects Moral Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(1), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04429-0
21. Schneiders, A. A. (1964). Personal adjustment and mental health (p. 1964). Rinehart and Winston.
22. Szyliowicz, J. S., & Vazquez, J. Z. (2024). Education | Definition, Development, History, Types, & Facts | Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/education
23. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success. Journal of Personality, 72(April 2004), 54.
24. Thorndike, R. M. (1995). Book review: psychometric theory by Jum Nunnally and Ira Bernstein
25. New York: McGraw-hill, 1994, xxiv+ 752 pp. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(3), 303–305.
26. Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2011). Measuring Multiple Intelligences and Moral Sensitivities in Education. In Measuring Multiple Intelligences and Moral Sensitivities in Education (Issue January). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-758-5
27. Tittle, C. R., Antonaccio, O., Botchkovar, E., & Kranidioti, M. (2010). Expected utility, self-control, morality, and criminal probability. Social Science Research, 39(6), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.007
28. Tongsuebsai, K., Sujiva, S., & Lawthong, N. (2015). Development and Construct Validity of the Moral Sensitivity Scale in Thai Version. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 718–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.586
29. Valavi, P., Harouni, N. S., & Moghadam, M. S. (2022). The lived experience of parents from educating morality to their children Phenomenological study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11(354). https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp
30. van den Berg, T. G. C., Kroesen, M., & Chorus, C. G. (2020). Does morality predict aggressive driving? A conceptual analysis and exploratory empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 74, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.08.017
31. Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8
32. Vitell, S. J., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Ammeter, A. P., Garner, B. L., & Novicevic, M. M. (2009). Religiosity and Moral Identity: The Mediating Role of Self Control. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9980-0
33. Waltzer, T., Cox, R. L., Moser, C. F., & Heyman, G. D. (2024). Don’t be a rat: An investigation of the taboo against reporting other students for cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 242, 105894. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECP.2024.105894
34. Xiang, Y., Cao, Y., & Dong, X. (2020). Childhood maltreatment and moral sensitivity: An interpretation based on schema theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 160(February), 109924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109924
35. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Юни Р., Путра П., Агусти И., Сапутра Х., Зайнал А., Тохири Р. Изучение влияния социальной поддержки, cаморегуляции и самоконтроля на формирование нравственности у студентов университета. Название журнала на русском. 2025;20(2):65-77. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.20.2.06. EDN: NHUCDQ
For citation:
Yuni R., Dwi Putra P., Selvia Agusti I., Saputra H., Zainal A., Thohiri R. Examining the Impact of Social Support, Self-Adjustment, and Self-Control on Fostering Morality in University Students. Title. 2025;20(2):65-77. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.20.2.06. EDN: NHUCDQ