Исследование факторов, влияющих на эффективность профессионального развития учителей: поисковое исследование на примере Вьетнама

Профессиональное развитие (ПР) играет значительную роль в продвижении образовательных реформ на различных уровнях во всех странах. За последние десять лет со стороны Министерства образования и подготовки кадров Вьетнама мероприятиям по профессиональному развитию учителей уделено большое внимание, оказана особая финансовая поддержка, что связано с фундаментальной и комплексной реформой образования в стране. Данное исследование направлено на выявление факторов, влияющих на эффективность профессионального развития учителей Вьетнама, что проявляется в качестве их знаний и навыков, в изменениях их установок и убеждений. Исследование проводилось с использованием количественного метода: с помощью стратифицированной случайной выборки было собрано 1 459 анкетных опросов от учителей, работающих в начальных, средних и старших классах Вьетнама. Результаты исследования свидетельствуют о существенном влиянии всех переменных модели на уровень знаний и навыков учителей, на изменение их установок и убеждений. Особо выделяются такие факторы профессионального развития, как активность обучения и его продолжительность: они оказывают наиболее выраженное воздействие на эффективность ПР учителей. Полученные результаты позволяют рекомендовать корректировку образовательной политики Вьетнама с целью удовлетворения потребности учителей в их профессиональном развитии.

1. Banilower, E. R., Heck, D. J., & Weiss, I. R. (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the national science foundation’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20145

2. Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A Review of Empirical Literature on Inquiry Professional Development: Alignment with Best Practices and a Critique of the Findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2

3. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 102(2), 294–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00057

4. Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Thomason, S., & Firth, A. (2005). The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: How Do Collaborative and Sustained CPD and Sustained but Not Collaborative CPD Affect Teaching and Learning.

5. Cristobal, E., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M. (2007). Perceived e‐service quality (PeSQ): Measurement validation and effects on consumer satisfaction and web site loyalty. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 17(3), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710744326

6. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2011). Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Reform.Phi Delta Kappan,92(6), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200622

7. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

8. Do, T-T., Hoang, K. C., Do, T., Trinh, T. P. T., Nguyen, D. N., Tran, T., Le, T. T. B. T., Nguyen, T. C., & Nguyen, T-T. (2021). Factors Influencing Teachers’ Intentions to Use Realistic Mathematics Education in Vietnam: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.2.14094.331-348

9. Dung, N. T. K., Huy, N. H. D., Hang, N. T., & Ha, D. T. T. (2020). Self-perception of teachers and managers of the impact of teachers’ professional development in Vietnam. Education and Self Development, 15(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd15.2.03

10. Fischer, C., Fishman, B., Dede, C., Eisenkraft, A., Frumin, K., Foster, B., Lawrenz, F., Levy, A. J., & McCoy, A. (2018). Investigating relationships between school context, teacher professional development, teaching practices, and student achievement in response to a nationwide science reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.02.011

11. Freeman, J. G., Marx, R. W., & Cimellaro, L. (2004). Emerging Considerations for Professional Development Institutes for Science Teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(2), 111– 131. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000044866.11608.ae

12. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915

13. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378802500207

14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 1(2).

15. Hallinger, P., Tran, N. H., & Truong, T. D. (2021). Mapping the professional learning of primary teachers in Vietnam: a multi-method case study. Professional Development in Education, 49(5), 856–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879218

16. Hoang, A., Ta, H. T., & Thuy, T. N. (2020). Thói quen phát triển chuyên môn của giáo viên ở các trường phổ thông Việt Nam [Professional development habits of teachers in Vietnamese high schools]. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/94hbg

17. Hunzicker, J. (2010). Effective professional development for teachers: a checklist. Professional Development in Education, 37(2), 177–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2010.523955

18. Kowalski, S. M., Taylor, J. A., Askinas, K. M., Wang, Q., Zhang, Q., Maddix, W. P., & Tipton, E. (2020). Examining Factors Contributing to Variation in Effect Size Estimates of Teacher Outcomes from Studies of Science Teacher Professional Development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(3), 430–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1726538

19. Li, N., Liu, E., Liu, C., & Guo, S. (2021). Rethinking the Factor of Duration for Professional Development: A Workshop-Seminar-Demonstration Class Model for Science Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11351

20. McChesney, K., & Aldridge, J. M. (2019). What gets in the way? A new conceptual model for the trajectory from teacher professional development to impact. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1667412

21. McLaughlin, M. W., & Zarrow, J. (2001). Teachers engaged in evidence-based reform: Trajectories of teachers’ inquiry, analysis, and action. Teachers Caught in the Action: Professional Development That Matters, 79–101.

22. Nguyen, H. T., Vu, N. T. T., Ha, X. V., Dinh, H. V. T., Truong, T. D., & Reynolds, B. L. (2023). Principal instructional leadership and its influence on teachers’ professional development at Vietnamese primary schools. Education 3-13, 53(3), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2195409

23. Ninlawan, G. (2015). Factors Which Affect Teachers’ Professional Development in Teaching Innovation and Educational Technology in the 21st Century under the Bureau of Special Education, Office of the Basic Education Commission. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1732–1735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.228

24. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308221

25. Penuel, W. R., Gallagher, L. P., & Moorthy, S. (2011). Preparing Teachers to Design Sequences of Instruction in Earth Systems Science: A Comparison of Three Professional Development Programs. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 996–1025. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410864

26. Phan, T. T. T., & Nguyen, T. V. A. (2021). Tìm hiểu thực trạng về động lực phát triển chuyên môn giáo viên tại Việt Nam [Understanding the current situation of motivation for teacher professional development in Vietnam]. Vietnam Journal of Education, 512(2-10/2021), 59–64.

27. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004

28. Rinaldi, A. G. P. (2007). Teachers’ perspectives of the career-stage appropriateness of professional learning programs. University of Georgia. Saade, S., Ghazala, F., Farhat, A., & Hallit, S. (2018). Attitudes towards continuous professional development: a study of pharmacists in Lebanon. Pharmacy Practice, 16(1), 1103. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1103

29. Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting Science Teacher Learning: The Role of Educative Curriculum Materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016569117024

30. Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0

31. Tinh, P. T., Le, T. T. T., Nguyen, P.-T., Le, C. D., Nguyen, M.-T., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2021). Preparing Pre-Service Teachers for Mathematics Teaching at Primary Schools in Vietnam. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10863

32. Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training. (2019). Estimated number of students for the 2019- 2020 school year. https://moet.gov.vn/thong-ke/Pages/Thong-ke-giao-duc-trung-hoc.aspx

33. Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training. (2020). General data on college-level teacher training for the 2018-2019 school year. https://moet.gov.vn/thong-ke/Pages/dao-tao-giao-vien-cao-dang.aspx?ItemID=6637