The Influence of Home Computer and Internet on Junior High School Students' Cognitive Ability: Evidence from China Education Panel Survey
https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.20.1.02
EDN: GKZCRV
Abstract
Based on the China Education Panel Survey 2017-2018 school year baseline data and 2018-2019 school year follow-up data, this paper forms short panel data, and uses the unconditional fixed effect panel quantile regression method to discuss the impact of home computer and Internet on junior high school students' cognitive ability. The results show that: firstly, home computer and internet have significant improvement effect on junior high school students with moderate cognitive ability. Secondly, Parents' discipline on junior high school students' use of computers and the Internet has an inverted U-shaped on their cognitive development as a whole. Thirdly, for junior high school students with low level of cognitive ability, the quality of the school is more important to their cognitive ability development. Fourthly, "expectation friction" between junior high school students and their parents' educational expectations will limit the development of junior high school students' cognitive ability as a whole. According to this, on the one hand, the government should implement the access and use of junior high school students' home computers and the Internet. On the other hand, parents should play the role of guidance and supervision in the process of junior high school students' using home computers and Internet, communicate in a timely manner, and create a good environment for the students' use of home computers and Internet.
About the Authors
Yue LiuBelarus
Yue Liu
Minsk
Jiacheng Gao
Belarus
Jiacheng Gao
Minsk
References
1. Brehm, W. C., & Silova, I. (2014). Hidden privatization of public education in Cambodia: Equity implications of private tutoring. Journal for educational research online, 6(1), 94-116. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:8842
2. Chevalier, N. (2018). Willing to think hard? The subjective value of cognitive effort in children. Child development, 89(4), 1283-1295. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12805
3. Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Davis, R. D., & Rostow, C. D. (2007). Cognitive Ability Predicts Objectively Measured Counterproductive Work Behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 616-627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.616
4. Figlio, D. N., Freese, J., Karbownik, K., & Roth, J. (2017). Socioeconomic status and genetic influences on cognitive development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(51), 13441-13446. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708491114
5. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of research on adolescence, 20(2), 507-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x
6. Guo, Y., & Adenan, A. (2025). The Effects of Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Abilities on Labor’s Income in China. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v4i1.5.2025
7. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2008). The Role of Cognitive Skills in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(3), 607-668. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.3.607
8. Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive ability on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior. NBER Working Papers, 24(3), 411-482. https://doi.org/10.1086/504455
9. Hora, M. T., & Blackburn Cohen, C. A. (2018). Cultural capital at work: How cognitive and noncognitive skills are taught, trained, and rewarded in a Chinese technical college. Community College Review, 46(4), 388-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552118784352
10. Korniotis, G. M., & Kumar, A. (2010). Cognitive abilities and financial decisions. Behavioral finance: Investors, corporations, and markets, 559-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118258415.ch30
11. Mills, K. L. (2016). Possible effects of internet use on cognitive development in adolescence. Media and Communication, 4(3), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i3.516
12. Moulton, V., Goodman, A., Nasim, B., Ploubidis, G. B., & Gambaro, L. (2021). Parental wealth and children’s cognitive ability, mental, and physical health: evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Child Development, 92(1), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13413
13. Tine, M. (2014). Working memory differences between children living in rural and urban poverty. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(4), 599-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2013.797906
14. Xie, W., Sandberg, J., Huang, C., & Uretsky, E. (2019). Left-behind villages, left-behind children: Migration and the cognitive achievement of rural children in China. Population, space and place, 25(8), e2243. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2243
15. Yamamoto, Y., & Holloway, S. D. (2010). Parental expectations and children's academic performance in sociocultural context. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9121-z
16. Yue, A., Gao, J., Yang, M., Swinnen, L., Medina, A., & Rozelle, S. (2018). Caregiver depression and early child development: a mixed-methods study from rural China. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02500
Review
For citations:
Liu Yu., Gao J. The Influence of Home Computer and Internet on Junior High School Students' Cognitive Ability: Evidence from China Education Panel Survey. Title. 2025;20(1):12-26. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.20.1.02. EDN: GKZCRV