Preview

Education and Self-Development

Advanced search

Development of an Instrument for Assessing the Effectiveness of Adolescents' Experimental Activity Based on Solving Physics-Oriented Tasks

https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.19.4.11

EDN: NTLDTB

Abstract

This article focuses on addressing the problem of enhancing the effectiveness of natural science education in schools, particularly in physics, by applying the principle of problem-based learning and designing lessons centered on experimental activity. The foundational unit of this model is a student's action that is motivated, deliberate, and aimed at attempting to solve a task, exploring solutions, and engaging in reflection and generalization of goal-directed actions. However, assessing the effectiveness of such actions requires high-quality research instruments capable of collecting reliable data. To address this challenge, we developed an assessment instrument and empirically tested some psychometric requirements. We hypothesized that the key requirements for such an instrument are: (1) alignment with the structure of activity; (2) multifunctionality and robustness against changes in the evaluator. These requirements were formulated by the authors based on V.V. Davydov's theory of learning activity and the theory of psycho-pedagogical measurement. Data collection was conducted through non-participant observation, with student activity evaluated by independent experts—assessors—using audio and video recordings of experimental lessons in three schools in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk. The validation of the instrument's requirements was carried out through the analysis of expert judgments and the application of consistency metrics, such as the proportion of matching results and Kendall's nonparametric concordance coefficient. The analysis of the collected data demonstrated that: (a) the developed instrument effectively captures actions related to task-solving in accordance with the theoretical model; (b) the assessments by independent observers yielded similar results, as reflected in acceptable consistency metrics for their evaluations.

About the Authors

A. Adamsky
Moscow City University; Institute for Problems of Educational Policy “Evrika”
Russian Federation

Alexander Adamsky

Moscow



N. Kolachev
HSE University
Russian Federation

Nikita Kolachev

Moscow



References

1. Adamskiy, A. I., & Lvovsky, V. A. (2023). Institutional breaks of the activity-based approach in physical education. Vestnik MGPU. Seriya «Pedagogika i psihologiya» – MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 17(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.1.05

2. Basyuk, V. S., & Kovaleva, G. S. (2019). Innovative project of the Ministry of Education “Monitoring of functional literacy development”: The main directions and the first results. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika – Domestic and foreign pedagogy, 1(4(61)), 13–33.

3. Cattel, R. B. (1983). Structured Personality-learning Theory: A Wholistic Multivariate Research Approach. Praeger.

4. Chulkova, G. M. (2022). Innovations in the System of Higher Education. Upravlenie naukoj: teoriya i praktika – Science Management: Theory and Practice, 4(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.9

5. Coombs, Ph. H. (1970). The world educational crisis. A systems analysis. Progress.

6. Davydov, V. V. (1996). Developmental learning theory. INTOR.

7. Gisev, N., Bell, J. S., & Chen, T. F. (2013). Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: key concepts, approaches, and applications. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 9(3), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.04.004

8. Institute for Strategy of Education Development. (2021). Working program of basic general education. Physics. Basic level. https://edsoo.ru/Primernaya_rabochaya_programma_osnovnogo_obschego_obrazovaniya_predmeta_Fizika_proekt_.htm?ysclid=lk7yi2yd61688715464

9. Jalil, S., Herman, Sidin Ali, M., & Haris, A. (2018). Development and validation of science process skills instrument in physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012203

10. Krüger, J. T., Höffler, T. N., Wahl, M., Knickmeier, K., & Parchmann, I. (2022). Two comparative studies of computer simulations and experiments as learning tools in school and out-of-school education. Instructional Science, 50, 69–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09566-1

11. Lvovsky, V., Yanishevskaya M., & Yakushina, E. (2021). An active approach to teaching the subjects of the natural science cycle is the key to the formation of students' skills necessary in real life. Media. Informaciya. Kommunikaciya – Media. Information. Communication, 36(1), 42–46.

12. Mikhailov, F. T. (1976). The mystery of the human self. Politizdat.

13. Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation. (2013). On approval of the professional standard “Pedagogue (pedagogical activity in the sphere of preschool, primary general, basic general, secondary general education) (tutor, teacher)”, Order No. 544н, 18th October. https://base.garant.ru/70535556/?ysclid=lkc9kpttmg502725260

14. Moslem, S., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Blaschke, T., & Duleba, S. (2019). Analysing stakeholder consensus for a sustainable transport development decision by the fuzzy AHP and interval AHP. Sustainability, 11(12), 3271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123271

15. OECD. (2023). PISA 2025 Science Framework (Draft). https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/assets/docs/PISA_2025_Science_Framework.pdf

16. Pentin, A. Yu., Nikiforof, G. G., & Nikishova, E. A. (2019). Main approaches to the assessment of scientific literacy. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika – Domestic and foreign pedagogy, 1(4(61)), 80–97.

17. Pentin, A., Kovaleva, G., Davidova, E., & Smirnova, E. (2018). Science Education in Russia According to the Results of the TIMSS and PISA International Studies. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 1, 79–109. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2018-1-79-109

18. Rubtsov, V. V., & Ulanovskaya, I. M. (Eds.). (2021). Cooperative learning activity and children's development. MGPPU.

19. Semenov, A. L. & Ziskin, K. E. (2021). The concept of an expanded personality as a reference point of the digital path of education. International Research and Practice Conference “The Herzen University Conference on Psychology in Education”, 4, 530–535.

20. Strannolyubsky, A. N. (1893). The State of Public Education in the Villages of European Russia. Russkaya shkola – Russian school, 4, 107–143.


Review

For citations:


Adamsky A., Kolachev N. Development of an Instrument for Assessing the Effectiveness of Adolescents' Experimental Activity Based on Solving Physics-Oriented Tasks. Education and Self-Development. 2024;19(4):133-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.19.4.11. EDN: NTLDTB

Views: 6


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1991-7740 (Print)