Technology for Assessing the Level of Competence Formation of a Graduate of Technical University
https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.1.09
Abstract
The main idea behind this research is to create and use a system for managing the quality of university education based on criterion scoring and monitoring of professional student development, the comparison of information received with the graduate requirements specified in the Federal State Educational Standard for Higher Education (FSES HE) in engineering and the adjustment of didactic conditions for professional and personal student development based on these indicators. The availability of such information provides the possibility to compare the actual student development with FSES HE requirements for a particular field of education. It also gives the opportunity to modify the educational process and identify “gaps” in contents, technologies and other characteristics of educational process and make the appropriate changes.
The technology that is used to evaluate the maturity level of a future engineer’s competence does not represent the evaluation of education quality as such. However, it creates a continuously updating database for implementing such evaluation. It is used to determine the effectiveness of contents, methods, means and forms of educational activities, etc. The suggested technology can be applied as a specific tool for “deciphering the gaps” identified in students or, in other words, for discovering failures in educational process management. By assessing the gaps in students’ knowledge, skills and thoughts it is possible to discover the “failures” in educational process and the aspects that have gaps and “defects”.
About the Authors
R. Zakieva
Kazan State Power Engineering University; Institute of Education Development Strategy of the Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Rafina Zakieva
Kazan
Moscow
A. Leontiev
Kazan State Power Engineering University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander Leontiev
Kazan
V. Serikov
Institute of Education Development Strategy of the Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav Serikov
Moscow
References
1. Anisimov, O. S. (1994). Acmeological foundations of the teacher’s reflective self-organization: Creativity and culture of thinking. Moscow.
2. Ayzenk, G. Y. (1995). The concept and definition of intelligence. Voprosy Psychologii, 1, 111-131.
3. Belbin, R. M. (2003). Management teams. Why they succeed or fail. HIPPO.
4. Bespalko, V. P. (1990). On the possibilities of a systematic approach in pedagogy. Sovetskaya pedagogika – Soviet pedagogy, 7, 59-62.
5. Bruner, J. (1956). Questionnaire “Determination of types of thinking and level of creativity”. https://psycabi.net/testy/355-test-na-myshlenie-i-kreativnost-oprosnik-opredelenie-tipov-myshleniyai-urovnya-kreativnosti-diagnostika-po-metodu-dzh-brunera
6. Dubovitskaya, T. D. (2004). Diagnostics of the level of professional orientation of students. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 8(2), 82-86.
7. Gorokhov, V. G. (1987). Know to do. The history of the engineering profession and its role in modern culture. Znanie.
8. Kansuzyan, L. V. (2013). Engineering activity: social value concept. [Doctoral dissertation, RUDN University]. http://www.dslib.net/soc-filosofia/inzhenernaja-dejatelnost-socialno-cennostnajakoncepcija.html
9. Kolmogorova, L. S. (2002). Test L. Michelson “Communicative skills” in the modification of Yu.Z. Gilbukha. Vlados-Press.
10. Komenskiy, Y. A. (1955). Great didactics. Nauka.
11. Kondakov, I. M. (2005). Diagnostics of professional installations. Voprosy Psychologii, 2, 122-130.
12. Kryshtanovskaya, O. V. (1989). Engineers. Formation and development of a professional group. Nauka.
13. Lednev, V. S. (1980). The content of general secondary education. Structural issues. Pedagogika.
14. Leontyev, D. A. (1989). Personality: Man in the world and the world in man. Voprosy Psychologii, 3, 3-19.
15. Liljaniemi, А., Paavilainen, H. (2020). Using digital twin technology in engineering education – course concept to explore benefits and barriers. Оpen engineering, 10(1), 377-385. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-0040
16. Luriya, A. R. (1975). Attention and memory. Izd-vo MGU.
17. Mashbits, Y. I. (2008). Psychological and pedagogical problems of computerization of education. Prosveshchenie.
18. Nikitayev, V. G., Pronichev, A. N., Berdnikovich, E. Yu, Chistov, K. S., Goncharenko, I. I., & Zaytsev, S. M. (2011). A method of teaching and mastering educational material. Invention Patent. Rossiya.
19. Rean, A. A., & Kolominsy, Ya. L. (2000). Social educational psychology. Piter.
20. Sepasgozar, S. (2020). Digital twin and web-based virtual gaming technologies for education: A case of construction management and engineering. Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4678-4686. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134678
21. Serikov, V. V., & Zakieva, R. R. (2022). Assessment of the professional development of students as a tool for managing the quality of education in a technical university. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika – Domestic and foreign pedagogy 1(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.24412/2224-0772-2022-83-75-86
22. Starkey, L. (2004). Critical thinking skills success: in 20 minutes a day. Learning Express.
23. Svichenskaya, O. N. (2005). A device for implementing holistic learning. Invention Patent. Rossiya.
24. Valeeva, R., & Kalimullin, A. (2021). Adapting or changing: The COVID-19 pandemic and teacher education in Russia. Education Sciences, 11(8), 408-420. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080408
25. Vikhman, V. V., & Romm, M. V. (2021). “Digital Twins” in education: Prospects and reality. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 30(2), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-2-22-32
26. Zhigalev, B. A. (2012). The system for assessing the quality of professional education in a linguistic university [Doctoral dissertation, Linguistics University of Nizhny Novgorod]. https://www.dissercat.com/content/sistema-otsenki-kachestva-professionalnogo-obrazovaniya-vlingvisticheskom-vuze/read
27. Zimnyaya, I. A. (1997). Pedagogical psychology. Feniks.
Review
For citations:
Zakieva R., Leontiev A., Serikov V. Technology for Assessing the Level of Competence Formation of a Graduate of Technical University. Education and Self-Development. 2023;18(1):121-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.1.09
Views:
9
Email this article 