Phenomena of influence of household artificial intelligence on child-parent relations in the family space
https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.20.2.08
EDN: UDWYZM
Abstract
The research is devoted to the problem of the influence of new digital technologies, artificial intelligence on the user's consciousness. Artificial intelligence is already included at the household level in family systems, but it remains a phenomenon poorly understood in developmental psychology, personality psychology and pedagogy. It is necessary, in particular, to understand how household artificial intelligence affects the development of the child's individual consciousness and child-parent relations. Purpose of the research: to study the synergetic effects of the relationship between neural networks and individual and group consciousness in family systems. The experiment observed the inclusion of the digital assistant in the family space and obtaining an emotional response to the interaction process. The research showed that neural networks became more and more intensively included in parental holons, child-parental subsystems of young families. Now family systems are in a situation of adaptation to the new user experience. Novelty and practical significance: the decrease of parental authority and weakening of its influence on the affective sphere of children due to the fact that the “neural nanny” has the ability to personalise content and emotion recognition functions.
About the Authors
Yu. Andreeva
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia Andreeva
Kazan
L. Fakhrutdinova
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lilia Fakhrutdinova
Kazan
R. Dautova
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Rezida Dautova
Kazan
D. Teleguzova
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Daria Teleguzova
Kazan
References
1. Andreeva, J. V., Shakurova, A. R., Yakupova, A. I., & Kosokina, I. A. (2024). Narrative Analysis of Motivational Structures of Students’ Civic Activity in the Cultural and Educational Sphere. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie – Education and Self Development, 19(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.19.1.06
2. Andreeva, J., Vitushkin, A., Kosokina, I., & Nizhelskaya, I. (2023) Information strategies for preventing destructive behavior of civic activism in criminal youth subculture. In E3S Web of Conferences, 449, 07007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344907007
3. Bharadwaj, N. A., Dubé, А. K., Talwar, V., & Patitsas, E. (2021). How Digital Assistants are used by Families in the Home: A multi-national study of use, interaction, and parental mediation. In TMS Proceedings 2021. https://doi.org/10.1037/tms0000075
4. Bowlby, J. (1958). The Nature of the Child’s Tie to His Mother. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 350–373.
5. Dautova, R. V., & Belousov, Y. D. (2023). Media immunity as a prerequisite for youth media safety in social networks. Mezdunarodniy nauchno-issledovatelskiy jurnal – International Scientific Research Journal, 2 (128). https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2023.128.20
6. Daw, N. D., & Doya, K. (2006). The computational neurobiology of learning and reward. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(2), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.006
7. Dilthey, V. (2002). Descriptive psychology. In P. Ya. Galperin & A. N. Zhdan (Eds.), The history of psychology. XX century (pp. 417–453). Yekaterinburg.
8. Dzyaloshinsky, I. M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence: A Humanitarian Perspective. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya – Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 21(6), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-6-20-29
9. Eidemiller, E. G., & Yustickis, V. (2008). Psychology and family psychotherapy (4th ed.). Piter.
10. Fachrutdinova, L. R., & Sabirov, T. N. (2017). Cross-Cultural studies of structural and dynamic features of learning experiences among Russian and Chinese teenagers. HELIX, 8(1), 2527–2530. https://doi.org/10.29042/2018-2527-2530
11. Fakhrutdinova, L. R. (2010). On the Phenomenon of “Perezhivanie”. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 48(2), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405480203
12. Fakhrutdinova, L. R. (2011). Structural and Dynamic Organization of a Subject’s Emotional Experience. Uchenie zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki» – Scientific notes of Kazan University. Humanities Series, 153(5), 110–120.
13. He, W., & Chen, M. (2024). Advancing Urban Life: A Systematic Review of Emerging Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in Urban Design and Planning. Buildings, 14(3), 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030835
14. Pashevich, E. (2022). Can communication with social robots influence how children develop empathy? Best-evidence synthesis. AI & Soc., 37, 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01214-z
15. Rayhan, S., & Rayhan, A. (2023). The Psychological Impact of Al: Adapting to a World of Smart Machines. Discover the world's research, juli. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29902.64329/1
16. Rubinstein, S. L. (1989). Fundamentals of general psychology. Pedagogika.
17. Shutcenberger, A. A. (2005). Ancestor syndrome: Transgenerational connections, family secrets, anniversary syndrome, transmission of trauma and practical use of the genosociogram. Izd-vo Instituta psihoterapii.
18. Varga, A. Ya., & Khamitova, I. Yu. (2005). Murray Bowen Family Systems Theory // Moskovskij psihoterapevticheskij zhurnal – Moscow Psychotherapeutic Journal, 1, 137–146.
19. Vygotsky, L. S. (2019). Psychology of development. Selected works. Yurait.
20. Zmanovskaya, E. V. (2017). Family psychology: basics of marital counselling and family psychotherapy: A textbook. INFRA-M.
Review
For citations:
Andreeva Yu., Fakhrutdinova L., Dautova R., Teleguzova D. Phenomena of influence of household artificial intelligence on child-parent relations in the family space. Education and Self-Development. 2025;20(2):97-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.20.2.08. EDN: UDWYZM
Views:
21
Email this article 