Внутренняя структура инструмента измерения школьной мотивации подростков

Основной целью данного исследования было исследование внутренней структуры самостоятельно разработанного «Инструмента измерения школьной мотивации подростков», предназначенного для использования в подростковой школе. В исследовании использовался эксплораторный количественный подход, а его дизайн был обоснован в рамках эксплораторного типа. Анкету заполнили 489 подростков, посещающих школу. Факторный анализ главных компонентов с варимакс-вращением подтвердил четырехфакторную структуру инструмента измерения школьной мотивации подростков, а для определения адекватности инструмента был проведен подтверждающий факторный анализ. Результаты показали, что каждый из факторов имеет хорошие значения внутренней надежности: 0,88 %, 0,87 %, 0,87 % и 0,81 % соответственно. SEM-модель школьной мотивации подтвердила, что факторная структура является хорошей моделью, так как RMSEA (p = 0,066) был значимым на высоком уровне. Кроме того, было подтверждено наличие интеркорреляций между каждым из компонентов: когнитивная мотивация и мотивация успеха (r = 0,95); когнитивная мотивация и социальная мотивация (r = 0,73); мотивация успеха и социальная мотивация (r = 0,73). Низкая корреляция существовала между компонентами социальной мотивации и мотивации избегания неудач (r = 0,03). В результате исследования был сделан вывод о том, что четыре фактора являются подходящим инструментом измерения школьной мотивации подростков для использования в работе с учащимися школ.

1. Abdulla, A. M., Runco, M. A., Alsuwaidi, H. N., & Alhindal, H. S. (2018). Obstacles to personal creativity among Arab women from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 5(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-0003

2. Amrai, K., Motlagh, S. E., Zalani, H. A., & Parhon, H. (2011). The relationship between academic motivation and academic achievement students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.111

3. Ardeleanu, A., Dorneanu, S., & Baltă, N. (2006). Marele dicționar al psihologiei [The Great Dictionary of Psychology]. Trei.

4. Badenes-Ribera, L., Silver, N. C., & Pedroli, E. (2020). Scale development and score validation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00799

5. Bailey, T. H., & Phillips, L. J. (2016). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance. Higher education research & development, 35(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474

6. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in public health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

7. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644

8. Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2022). Measuring Students’ School Motivation. Education Sciences, 12(6), 378. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060378

9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

10. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859

11. Feldon, D. F., Callan, G., Juth, S., & Jeong, S. (2019). Cognitive load as motivational cost. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09464-6

12. Fong, C. J. (2022). Academic motivation in a pandemic context: a conceptual review of prominent theories and an integrative model. Educational Psychology, 42(10), 1204–1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2026891

13. Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of research in science teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442

14. Hattie, J., Hodis, F. A., & Kang, S. H. (2020). Theories of motivation: Integration and ways forward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101865

15. Heggestad, E. D., & Kanfer, R. (2000). Individual differences in trait motivation: Development of the Motivational Trait Questionnaire. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(7-8), 751–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00049-5

16. Heimerdinger, S. R., & Hinsz, V. B. (2008). Failure avoidance motivation in a goal-setting situation. Human Performance, 21(4), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280802347155

17. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

18. Kline, R. B. (1998). Structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

19. Kotera, Y., Conway, E., & Van Gordon, W. (2019). Ethical judgement in UK business students: Relationship with motivation, self-compassion and mental health. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 1132–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0034-2

20. Kotera, Y., Taylor, E., Fido, D., Williams, D., & Tsuda-McCaie, F. (2023). Motivation of UK graduate students in education: Self-compassion moderates pathway from extrinsic motivation to intrinsic motivation. Current Psychology, 42(12), 10163–10176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02301-6

21. Lubart, T., & Guignard, J.-H. (2004). The Generality-Specificity of Creativity: A Multivariate Approach. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 43–56). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-004

22. Mngomezulu, M. S., Lawrence, K. C., & Mabusela, M. S. (2021). Recruiting competent teachers in South Africa for a sustainable future: The role of school governing bodies. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v3i1.927

23. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw.

24. Prudon, P. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis as a tool in research using questionnaires: a critique. Comprehensive Psychology, 4, 03-CP. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/03.CP.4.10

25. Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

26. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

27. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology press.

28. Schumm, M. F., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). Measuring adolescent science motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1147659

29. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary educational psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

30. Seel, N. M. (Ed.). (2011). Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer Science & Business Media.

31. Shadfar, S., & Malekmohammadi, I. (2013). Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in restructuring state intervention strategies toward paddy production development. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(12), 576. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i12/472

32. Steinmayr, R., Weidinger, A. F., Schwinger, M., & Spinath, B. (2019). The importance of students’ motivation for their academic achievement–replicating and extending previous findings. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 464340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01730

33. Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition, 2. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03

34. Watkins, D., & Hattie, J. (2012). Multiple goals in a Hong Kong Chinese educational context: An investigation of developmental trends and learning outcomes. Australian Journal of Education, 56(3), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411205600306

35. Wetzel, A. P. (2012). Factor analysis methods and validity evidence: a review of instrument development across the medical education continuum. Academic Medicine, 87(8), 1060–1069. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825d305d

36. Wentzel, K. R. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and adolescent competence at school. In Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 17–36). Brill. https://brill.com/display/title/37886

37. Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (2009). Promoting motivation at school: Interventions that work. Educational Psychologist, 42, 187–194.

38. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. Hoboken.