Overcoming as a Factor of Self-Development
https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.19.2.05
EDN: GQRPPN
Abstract
The article analyzes the results of a study aimed at studying overcoming as a leading factor that ensures self-development of the individual and actualizes the need to use pedagogical tools in modern educational practice that contribute to the formation in children and young people of the perception of overcoming difficulties as an opportunity for personal growth. The relevance of studying the problem of self-development and its procedural component is due to various reasons: the new socio-cultural reality, which predetermined the rapid pace of self-development as a condition for the competitiveness of the individual; a high level of motivation of the younger generation to achieve success as a result of self-development; the unpreparedness of modern children and youth to overcome obstacles on the way to achieving the goal; the presence of psychological barriers blocking readiness for self-development. The conclusions are based both on the results of a theoretical analysis of modern scientific literature and on the results of our surveys. Empirical research methods were survey methods presented by the author's tools. The study involved 2474 students aged 11-16 living in the Moscow, Yaroslavl, Kostroma and Kaluga regions. The study included the design and testing of the technology of pedagogical support for self-development of adolescents in additional education in a situation of overcoming difficulties, the implementation of which makes it possible to form adolescents' readiness for self-development, helps to build up individual experience of successful overcoming through the purposeful formation of adaptive coping strategies. The conclusion is made about the effectiveness of the implementation of technology in the conditions of additional education, as well as the possibility of dissemination of the received pedagogical experience in educational organizations of various types and types.
About the Authors
I. Ivanova
Kaluga State University. K.E. Tsiolkovsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina Ivanova
Kaluga, Russia
M. Rozhkov
All-Russian Center for the Development of Artistic Creativity and Humanitarian Technologies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail Rozhkov
Moscow, Russia
References
1. Andreev, V. V., & Andreev, V. V. (2019). Psychological concept of overcoming: theory, methodology, diagnostics. Rossiiskii psihologicheskii jurnal – Russian psychological journal, 16(3), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2019.3.2
2. Antopolskaya, T. A., Panov, V. I., & Silakov, A. S. (2020). A model of personal agency development in generation Z adolescents in a socially enriched environment of additional education. Gercenovskie chteniya: psihologicheskie issledovaniya v obrazovanii – The Herzen University Studies: Psychology in Education, 3, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2020-3-5
3. Astashova, Yu. V. (2014). Generation theory in marketing. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series Economics and Management, 8(1), 108–114.
4. Bayborodova, L. V. (2019). What pedagogical technologies are modern? In Problems and prospects for the development of rural educational organizations: Materials of the international scientific and practical conference. (pp. 156–164). YaGPU.
5. Bederxanova, V. P., Demakova, I. D., & Kry’lova, N. B. (2012). Humanistic meanings of education. Problemi sovremennogo obrazovaniya – Problems of Modern Education, 1, 16–27.
6. Cai, M. (2019). Professional self-development based on informal learning: A case study of foreign language teachers in a university of China. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(12), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.4236/Jss.2019.712003
7. Carr, A. (2019). Positive Psychology and You: A Self-Development Guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429274855
8. Demakova, I. D. (2016). International integration Korchak camp “Our House”: Educational results (1993-2016). In R. A. Valeeva (Ed.), Social and pedagogical technologies of work with various categories of children: Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 25th anniversary of the Russian Society of Janusz Korczak (pp. 71–78). Otechestvo Publ.
9. Dimmock, M. (2019, January 17). Defining generations: Where millennials end and post-millennials begin, pew research center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/wheremillennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
10. Edwards, G., & Turner, A. F. (2020). Problematising self-development in leadership learning. https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/831160
11. Evladova, E. B. (2018). Self-organization: A promising opportunity for the development of additional education and extracurricular activities of schoolchildren. Obrazovatelnaya panorama – Educational panorama, 1(9), 71–76.
12. Golovanov, V. P. (2021). Modern additional education: the space of a happy and successful childhood. Pedagogicheskoe iskusstvo – Pedagogical art, 2, 83–89.
13. Grebenyuk, O. S., & Grebenyuk, T. B. (2000). Fundamentals of pedagogy of individuality: Textbook. Izdatel'stvo KGU.
14. Gushchina, T. N. (2018). Self-organization of students - the path to success. In M. A. Rozhkov (Ed.), Overcoming as a path to success. Experience of pedagogical search for innovative platforms: a methodological guide (pp. 35–42). Institut izucheniya detstva, sem'i i vospitaniya Rossijskoj akademii obrazovaniya.
15. Ivanova I. V. (2023). Self-knowledge and self-development (M. A. Rozhkov, Ed.). Izd-vo Direkt-media.
16. Ivanova, I. V. (2017). Reflexive and value-based approach to pedagogical support of adolescent self-development: Approach to the implementation of new standards. Standarti i monitoring v obrazovanii – Standards and monitoring in education, 5(6), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a1bfb0bb17788.67058203
17. Ivanova, I. V. (2021). Technology of pedagogical support of self-development of adolescents in additional education. Socialno-politicheskie issledovaniya – Social and Political Research, 3(12), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.20323/2658-428X-2021-3-12-100-115
18. Ivanova, I. V. (2022). Pedagogical support of self-development of adolescents in additional education [Dr. Sc. dissertation, Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky]. https://viewer.rsl.ru/ru/rsl01011150970 (OD 71 22-13/20)
19. Leontiev, D. A. (2011). New guidelines for understanding personality in psychology: From the necessary to the possible. Voprosy psychologii, 1, 3–27.
20. Manina, V. A. (2016). Psychological counseling in overcoming psychological barriers. Lichnost' v menyayushchemsya mire: zdorov'ye, adaptatsiya, razvitiye – Personality in a changing world: health, adaptation, development, 4(15), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.23888/humJ2016415-20
21. Maralov, V. G., Nizovskikh, N. A., & Shchukina, M. A. (2017). Psychology of self-development: textbook and workshop for undergraduate and graduate students (2nd ed.). Izd-vo Yurayt.
22. Miroshkina, M. R. (2014). Different generations - different pedagogical approach. Shkolnie tehnologii – Journal of School Technology, 2, 8–19.
23. Ng, T. (2019). Experiences of Chinese young people in devising their self-development plans in Hong Kong: a qualitative study. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 34, 167–185. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2019.34.9
24. Orlov, A. B. (2000). Personality and essence: external and internal self of a person. In Psychology of personality (pp. 509–533). Izd-vo BAHRAH-M.
25. Rozhkov, M. I. (2002). The concept of existential pedagogy. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik – Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 4(33), 73–77.
26. Shakurov, R. Kh. (2001). Barrier as a category and its role in activity. Voprosy psychologii, 1, 13–18.
27. Shamsutdinov, R. R., & Yuldasheva, O. N. (2016). Network community: risks and prospects. Simvol nauki – Symbol of science, 3-4(15), 185–189.
28. Shchukina, M. A. (2014). Subjectivity approach to self-development of the personality: theoretical understanding and empirical study. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics – Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 11(2), 7–22.
29. Smirnov, R. G. (2019). Operationalization of the “Online Generation” phenomenon. Digital sociology, 2(4), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2019-4-31-38
30. Sokolova, N. A. (2006). Theoretical and methodological foundations of the social and pedagogical support of the child in additional education. ChGPU Publ.
31. Sytnik, G. V., & Andreev, V. V. (2019). Influence of the level of sportsmanship of athletes on the frequency of use of various strategies for overcoming crisis situations. Kultura fizicheskaya i zdorove – Physical culture and health, 1(69), 133–134.
32. Twenge, J. (2018, January 26). How Are Generations Named? Trend. The Pew Charitable Trusts. https://trend.pewtrusts.org/en/archive/winter-2018/foreword-how-are-generations-named
33. Vasilevskaya, E. A. (2016). Overcoming behavior as a success of experiencing critical situations in pedagogues. Lichnost' v menyayushchemsya mire: zdorov'ye, adaptatsiya, razvitiye – Personality in a changing world: Health, adaptation, development, 4(15), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.23888/humJ2016442-47
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1996). Vygotsky: collection of works. Izdatel'skiy dom Shalvy Amonashvili.
35. Zolotareva, A. V. (2020). Management of an educational organization. Development of an institution of additional education for children: A textbook for universities (2nd ed.). Izd-vo Yurayt.
Review
For citations:
Ivanova I., Rozhkov M. Overcoming as a Factor of Self-Development. Education and Self-Development. 2024;19(2):54-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.19.2.05. EDN: GQRPPN
Views:
3
Email this article 