kvmolurОбразование и саморазвитиеEducation and Self-Development1991-7740Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет10.26907/esd.20.2.01RCRGUKBkvmolur-3Research ArticleСтатьиОт редактора: Качество vs количество: исследование опыта в образованииEditorial: Quality vs quantity: a study of experience in educationhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-6990БаклашоваТ. А.BaklashovaT.
Казань
Kazan
ptatyana2011@mail.ruКазанский (Приволжский) федеральный университетРоссияKazan (Volga region) Federal UniversityRussian Federation202518092025202611Copyright © Баклашова Т.А., 20252025Баклашова Т.А.Baklashova T.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://kvmolur.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3
.
.
ReferencesМакарова, Н. С., Дроботенко, Ю. Б. Фокус-групповое исследование изменений образовательного процесса в современном вузе // Вестник евразийской науки. – 2014. – № 2 (21). – С. 162.Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university 5e. McGraw-hill education (UK).Маркова, С. М., Наркозиев, А. К. Методика исследования содержания профессионального образования // Вестник Мининского университета. – 2019. – Т. 7. – № 1. – С. 2. – DOI: 10.26795/2307-1281-2019-7-1-2Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge.Татур, Ю. Г. Высшее образование: методология и опыт проектирования. – Litres, 2017.Carmichael, M., Reid, A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2018). Assessing the impact of educational video on student engagement, critical thinking and learning. A SAGE white paper, 1–21.Biggs, J., Tang, C., Kennedy, G. Teaching for quality learning at university 5e. – McGraw-hill education (UK), 2022.Makarova, N. S., & Drobotenko, YU. B. (2014). Focus-group study of changes in university educational process. Vestnik evrazijskoj nauki – Bulletin of Eurasian Science, 2(21), 162.Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D. Reflection: Turning experience into learning. – Routledge, 2013.Markova, S. M., & Narcosiev, A. K. (2019). Research technique of the content of professional education. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta – Vestnik of Minin University, 7(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2019-7-1-2Carmichael, M., Reid, A., Karpicke, J. D. Assessing the impact of educational video on student engagement, critical thinking and learning // A SAGE white paper. – 2018. – Pp. 1–21.McDavid, J. C., Huse, I., & Hawthorn, L. R. (2018). Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice. Sage Publications.McDavid, J. C., Huse, I., Hawthorn, L. R. L. Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice. – Sage Publications, 2018.Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., Varpio, L. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others // Perspectives on Medical Education. – 2019. – Vol. 8. – Pp. 90–97. – DOI: 10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2Prabhu, G. N. (2020). Teaching the Scope and Limits of Generalizability in Qualitative Research. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 1, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.1.2020.186-192Prabhu, G. N. Teaching the scope and limits of generalizability in qualitative research // New Trends in Qualitative Research. – 2020. – Vol. 1. – Pp. 186–192. – DOI: 10.36367/ntqr.1.2020.186-192Pregoner, J. D. (2024). Research Approaches in Education: A Comparison of Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods. IMCC Journal of Science, 4(2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5111007Pregoner, J. D. Research Approaches in Education: A Comparison of Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods // IMCC Journal of Science. – 2024. – Vol. 4. – No. 2. – Pp. 31–36. – DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5111007Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 12(1), 22–29.Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., Syam, H. Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies // IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME). – 2022. – Vol. 12. – No. 1. – Pp. 22–29.Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education. Routledge. Schofield, J. W. (2000). Increasing the Generalizability of Qualitative Research. Case study method, 69–97. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986274.n8Sallis, E. Total quality management in education. – Routledge, 2014. Schofield, J. W. Increasing the Generalizability of Qualitative Research // Case study method. – 2000. – Pp. 69–97. – DOI: 10.4135/9781412986274.n8Tatur, YU. G. (2017). Higher education: methodology and design experience. Litres.Thelwall, M., Nevill, T. Is research with qualitative data more prevalent and impactful now? Interviews, case studies, focus groups and ethnographies // Library & Information Science Research. – 2021. – Vol. 43. – No. 2. – P. 101094. – DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101094Thelwall, M., & Nevill, T. (2021). Is research with qualitative data more prevalent and impactful now? Interviews, case studies, focus groups and ethnographies. Library & Information Science Research, 43(2), 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101094
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.