kvmolurОбразование и саморазвитиеEducation and Self-Development1991-7740Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет10.26907/esd.19.2.08IYJKWOkvmolur-129Research ArticleСтатьиВлияние online-дискуссий на формирование навыков аргументации у будущих инженеровThe Influence of Online Discussions on the Formation of Argumentation skills in Future Engineershttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9466-9076МихеевС. А.MikheevS.

Сергей А. Михеев

Новосибирск, Россия

Sergey Mikheev

Novosibirsk, Russia

omega1978@yandex.ruНовосибирский государственный архитектурно-строительный университетРоссияNovosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil EngineeringRussian Federation202401102025192100115Copyright © Михеев С.А., 20252025Михеев С.А.Mikheev S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://kvmolur.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/129

В статье представлены результаты эмпирического исследования по изучению результативности online-дискуссий (ОД) в качестве инструмента формирования аргументационных навыков у студентов технических вузов. Актуальность исследования обусловлена, с одной стороны, значимостью дискуссионной подготовки современных технических специалистов в  условиях сетевизации и социотехнической трансформации инженерной деятельности. С  другой – неразработанностью данной проблемы в отечественной педагогической науке, противоречивостью и наличием слабо изученных аспектов в зарубежной. Результаты настоящего исследования важны для научно обоснованного методического внедрения новых подходов к подготовке инженерных кадров в условиях цифровизации образования и повышения требований к дискуссионной и информационной компетентности современного технического специалиста. Исследование проводилось на базе двух новосибирских вузов и  охватывало 350 студентов 2-3 курса, обучающихся по специальностям бакалавриата «строительство» и «автоматика и вычислительная техника». Анализ результатов ОД, которые проводились в VLE «Moodle» с использованием методов «дебаты» (синхронная дискуссия) и «форум» (асинхронная дискуссия) показал, что включение online-дискуссий в образовательный процесс технических вузов способствует улучшению аргументационных навыков будущих инженеров на 20-30  %. Полученные на стадии формирующего и контрольного эксперимента данные позволили выявить более высокую результативность асинхронных форм online-дискуссий по сравнению с синхронными. Их преимущество для аргументации высшего уровня составляет до 29% в зависимости от формируемого компонента. По итогам исследования были даны рекомендации преподавателям для повышения результативности социального взаимодействия обучающихся в ходе OД, включая целесообразность замены дебатов синхронными дискуссионными методами, в большей степени ориентированными на совместный поиск решений.

The paper presents the results of empirical research on the effectiveness of online discussions (OD) as a tool for forming argumentation skills among technical university students. On the one hand the actuality of the research is conditioned by the significance of discussion-based training of modern technical specialists under conditions of networking and socio-technical transformation of engineering activity. On the other hand, this problem is not elaborated in the domestic, pedagogies and also contradictory and poorly studied aspects in the foreign one. The results of the present study are important for scientifically substantiated methodological implementation of new approaches to engineering training under conditions of digitalization of education and increased requirements for discussion and information competence of a modern technical specialist. The research was conducted on the basis of two Novosibirsk universities and covered 350 second – and third-year students in "construction" and "automation and computer engineering" baccalaureate specialties. The analysis of the OD results conducted in VLE "Moodle" using "debate" (synchronous discussion) and "forum" (asynchronous discussion) methods showed that inclusion of online-discussions in to the educational process of technical universities improves argumentation skills of future engineers by 20-30 %. The data obtained at the stages of the forming and control experiment let us reveal a higher efficiency of asynchronous forms of onlinediscussions in comparison with synchronous ones. Their advantage is to 28,68 %, depending on the formed component of argumentation. Based on the results of the study recommendations were given to teachers to improve the effectiveness of social interaction of students during OD, including the feasibility of replacing debates with synchronous discussion methods, more focused on the joint search for solutions.

online-дискуссияаргументационные навыкиаргументационная модельдискуссионная компетенцияинженерonline discussionargumentation skillsargumentationdiscussion competenceengineerReferencesБуденкова, Е. А. Онлайн-дискуссии: преимущества и методика проведения // Образовательные технологии. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 113–127.Budenkova, E. A. (2012). Online-discussions: advantages and methodology. Obrazovatel'nye tehnologii – Educational Technologies, 3, 113–127.Ивлев, Ю. В. Основы логической теории аргументации // Логические исследования. 2003. – Т. 10. – С. 50–60.Ivlev, Yu. V. (2003). Fundamentals of the Logical Theory of Argumentation. Logicheskie issledovanija – Logical Investigations, 10, 50–60.Кларин, М. В. Инновационные модели обучения: Исследование мирового опыта. – М.: Луч, 2018. – 640 c.Klarin, M. V. (2018). Innovative models of learning: A study of world experience. Luch.Михеев, С. А. Модель формирования дискуссионной компетенции студентов технических вузов с использованием средств информатизации // Педагогика и психология образования. – 2022. – № 3. – С. 31–48. – DOI:10.31862/1819-463X-2022-4-189-200Mikheev, S. A. (2022). Model of formation of discussion competence of students of technical universities with the use of informatization means. Pedagogika i psihologija obrazovanija – Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 3, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-297X-2022-3-129-148Перфилова, А. В. Зарубежный опыт организации учебных онлайн-дискуссий в вузе // Национальная гвардия на страже Независимости страны: теория и практика служебно-боевой деятельности (к 25-летию Независимости Республики Казахстан). Сб. материалов междунар. науч.-практич. конф. Петропавловск: ВИ НГ Республики Казахстан, 2016. – Ч. 2. – 381 с.Perfilova, A. V. (2016). Foreign experience of organizing educational online discussions at universities. In Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference (pp. 283–286). Petropavlovsk: VI National Guard of the Republic of Kazakhstan.Уваров, А. Ю., Ван, С., Кан, Ц. и др. Проблемы и перспективы цифровой трансформации образования в России и Китае. II Российско-китайская конференция исследователей образования «Цифровая трансформация образования и искусственный интеллект». Москва, Россия, 26–27 сентября 2019 г. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2019. – 155 с.Uvarov, A. Y., Wang, S., Kang, C., Su, Х., Cao, P., Jiang, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, S. (2019). Problems and prospects of digital transformation of education in Russia and China. In II RussianChinese Conference of Education Researchers “Digital Transformation of Education and Artificial Intelligence”. Higher School of Economics Publishing House.Ackerman, D, Gross, B. Synchronous online discussion board as a primary mode of delivering marketing education: responding to the covid-19 pandemic and beyond // Marketing Education Review. – 2021. – Vol. 31. – No. 4. – P. 284-293. DOI:10.1080/10528008.2021.1893752Ackerman, D, Gross, B. Synchronous online discussion board as a primary mode of delivering marketing education: responding to the covid-19 pandemic and beyond // Marketing Education Review. – 2021. – Vol. 31. – No. 4. – P. 284-293. DOI:10.1080/10528008.2021.1893752Akyol, Z., Garrison, D., Ozden, M. Online and Blended Communities of Inquiry: Exploring the Developmental and Perceptional Differences // International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. – 2009. – Vol. 10. – No. 6. – P. 65–83. – DOI:10. 10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765Akyol, Z., Garrison, D., Ozden, M. Online and Blended Communities of Inquiry: Exploring the Developmental and Perceptional Differences // International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. – 2009. – Vol. 10. – No. 6. – P. 65–83. – DOI:10. 10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765Breivik, J. Argumentative patterns in students’ online discussions in an introductory philosophy course // Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy. – 2020. – Vol. 15. – No. 1. – P. 8–23. – DOI:10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-01-02Breivik, J. Argumentative patterns in students’ online discussions in an introductory philosophy course // Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy. – 2020. – Vol. 15. – No. 1. – P. 8–23. – DOI:10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-01-02Clark, D. B., Sampson, V. Analyzing the quality of argumentation supported by personallyseeded discussions // The Next 10 Years! Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, CSCL '05, Taipei, Taiwan, May 30 - June 4, 2005. – DOI:10.3115/1149293.1149304Clark, D. B., Sampson, V. Analyzing the quality of argumentation supported by personallyseeded discussions // The Next 10 Years! Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, CSCL '05, Taipei, Taiwan, May 30 - June 4, 2005. – DOI:10.3115/1149293.1149304Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., Erkens, G. Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments // Educational Psychology Review. – 2007. – Vol. 19. – P. 343–374. – DOI:10.1007/s10648-007-9050-7Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., Erkens, G. Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments // Educational Psychology Review. – 2007. – Vol. 19. – P. 343–374. – DOI:10.1007/s10648-007-9050-7de Vries, E., Lund, K., Baker, M. Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions // The Journal of the Learning Sciences. – 2002. – Vol. 11. – No. 1. – P. 63–103. – DOI:10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_3de Vries, E., Lund, K., Baker, M. Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions // The Journal of the Learning Sciences. – 2002. – Vol. 11. – No. 1. – P. 63–103. – DOI:10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_3Erduran, S., Simon, S., Osborne, J. TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse // Science Education. – 2004. – Vol. 88. – No. 6. – P. 915–933. – DOI:10.1002/sce.20012Erduran, S., Simon, S., Osborne, J. TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse // Science Education. – 2004. – Vol. 88. – No. 6. – P. 915–933. – DOI:10.1002/sce.20012Ergulec, F. Design and facilitation strategies used in asynchronous online discussions // Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. – 2019. – Vol. 7. – No. 2 – P. 20–36. DOI:10.17220/mojet.2019.02.002Ergulec, F. Design and facilitation strategies used in asynchronous online discussions // Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. – 2019. – Vol. 7. – No. 2 – P. 20–36. DOI:10.17220/mojet.2019.02.002Garrison, D., Anderson, T., Archer, W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education // American Journal of Distance Education. – 2001. – Vol. 15. – No. 1. – P. 7–23. – DOI:10.1080/08923640109527071Garrison, D., Anderson, T., Archer, W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education // American Journal of Distance Education. – 2001. – Vol. 15. – No. 1. – P. 7–23. – DOI:10.1080/08923640109527071Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., Anderson, T. Analysis of A Global Online Debate and The Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing // Journal of Educational Computing Research. – 1997. – Vol. 17. – No. 4. – P. 397–431. DOI:10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAGGunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., Anderson, T. Analysis of A Global Online Debate and The Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing // Journal of Educational Computing Research. – 1997. – Vol. 17. – No. 4. – P. 397–431. DOI:10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAGHirvela, A. Argumentation & second language writing: Are we missing the boat? // Journal of Second Language Writing. – 2017. – Vol. 36. – P. 69–74. – DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.002Hirvela, A. Argumentation & second language writing: Are we missing the boat? // Journal of Second Language Writing. – 2017. – Vol. 36. – P. 69–74. – DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.002Leitao, S. The potential of argument in knowledge building // Human Development. – 2000. – Vol. 43. – No. 6. – P. 332–360. – DOI:10.1159/000022695Leitao, S. The potential of argument in knowledge building // Human Development. – 2000. – Vol. 43. – No. 6. – P. 332–360. – DOI:10.1159/000022695Lucas, M., Gunawardena, C., Moreira, A. Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2014. – Vol. 30. – P. 574–582. – DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050Lucas, M., Gunawardena, C., Moreira, A. Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2014. – Vol. 30. – P. 574–582. – DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050Majidi, A., Janssen, D., De Graaff, R. The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education // System. – 2021. – Vol. 101. – No. 102576. – DOI:10.1016/j.system.2021.102576Majidi, A., Janssen, D., De Graaff, R. The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education // System. – 2021. – Vol. 101. – No. 102576. – DOI:10.1016/j.system.2021.102576Olesova, L., Slavin, M., Lim, J. Exploring the Effect of Scripted Roles on Cognitive Presence in Asynchronous Online Discussions // Online Learning. – 2016. – Vol. 20. – No. 4. – P. 34–53. – DOI:10.24059/olj.v20i4.1058Olesova, L., Slavin, M., Lim, J. Exploring the Effect of Scripted Roles on Cognitive Presence in Asynchronous Online Discussions // Online Learning. – 2016. – Vol. 20. – No. 4. – P. 34–53. – DOI:10.24059/olj.v20i4.1058Rinekso, A. B., Muslim, A. B. Synchronous online discussion: Teaching English in higher education amidst the covid-19 pandemic // JEES. – 2020. – Vol. 5. – No. 2. – P. 155–162. DOI:10.21070/jees.v5i2.646Rinekso, A. B., Muslim, A. B. Synchronous online discussion: Teaching English in higher education amidst the covid-19 pandemic // JEES. – 2020. – Vol. 5. – No. 2. – P. 155–162. DOI:10.21070/jees.v5i2.646Rodriguez, M. A. Content Analysis as a Method to Assess Online Discussions for Learning // SAGE Open. – 2014. – Vol. 4. – No. 4. – DOI:10.1177/2158244014559019Rodriguez, M. A. Content Analysis as a Method to Assess Online Discussions for Learning // SAGE Open. – 2014. – Vol. 4. – No. 4. – DOI:10.1177/2158244014559019Dewi, G. P. R., Santosa, M. H. Students’ perception on the facilitation strategies provided by teachers in asynchronous online discussion // LLT Journal. – 2022. – Vol. 25. – No. 1. – P. 160–170. – DOI:10.24071/llt.v25i1.3579Dewi, G. P. R., Santosa, M. H. Students’ perception on the facilitation strategies provided by teachers in asynchronous online discussion // LLT Journal. – 2022. – Vol. 25. – No. 1. – P. 160–170. – DOI:10.24071/llt.v25i1.3579Schindler, L., Burkholder, G. Instructional Design and Facilitation Approaches that Promote Critical Thinking in Asynchronous Online Discussions: A Review of the Literature // Higher Learning Research Communications. – 2014. – Vol. 4. – No. 4. – P. 11–29. –DOI:10.18870/hlrc.v4i4.222Schindler, L., Burkholder, G. Instructional Design and Facilitation Approaches that Promote Critical Thinking in Asynchronous Online Discussions: A Review of the Literature // Higher Learning Research Communications. – 2014. – Vol. 4. – No. 4. – P. 11–29. –DOI:10.18870/hlrc.v4i4.222Selhorst, A. L., Klein, E., Harrison, J. Cohort-Specific online discussion experiences: a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to improving student learning // Contemporary Issues in Education Research. – 2017. – Vol. 10. – No. 4. – P. 241–254.Selhorst, A. L., Klein, E., Harrison, J. Cohort-Specific online discussion experiences: a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to improving student learning // Contemporary Issues in Education Research. – 2017. – Vol. 10. – No. 4. – P. 241–254.Toulmin, S. E. The Uses of Argument. – Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 247 p. – DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511840005Toulmin, S. E. The Uses of Argument. – Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 247 p. – DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511840005

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.